To: JeanS
However, he credits Gore with acting in the nation’s best interests by not challenging the results of the 2000 election.
Did I miss something? Didn't Gore challenge the results of the 2000 election?
To: CIB-173RDABN
"Did I miss something? Didn't Gore challenge the results of the 2000 election?"
Three separate times, if I recall correctly. There were at least 3 recounts anyway, all of which Bush won. This is hilarious.
Qwinn
12 posted on
10/14/2003 6:36:50 PM PDT by
Qwinn
To: CIB-173RDABN
I guess he means that Gore didn't order the Army to surround the White House. How big of him.
29 posted on
10/14/2003 7:07:01 PM PDT by
Az Joe
To: CIB-173RDABN
"Did I miss something? Didn't Gore challenge the results of the 2000 election"
...That ridiculous statement kinda jumps out at you doesn't it?
...Two people who had good reason to challenge an election but didn't: Richard Nixon-1960 and John Ashcroft in Missouri in 2000.
To: CIB-173RDABN
Didn't Gore challenge the results of the 2000 election?You gonna believe your own lyin' eyes or Daschle?
Daschle was so upset about Bush telling him not to lie. If you don't believe him, then he will really be deeply disappointed and saddened.
39 posted on
10/14/2003 7:18:58 PM PDT by
BillF
(Support Our Troops http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/997137/posts)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson