[Pubbie]

"When it comes to Rush and pills, an analagous situation would be Reagan and guns. After Reagan got shot, what an opportunity to change that debate on guns!

What the hell is that supposed to mean?"

It means Regean should have BANNED ALL GUNS, after he got shot.

My goodness, that's not a very libertarian postition for Maher, who claims to be a "Libertarian".

And the "Libertarian" Maher is also for Big Government, higher taxes, and an array of EnviroWacko policies.

Oh well, this Asshole is going to be SOOOOOOOO Disappointed next year when Bush Nukes Dean, just like when he was pouting on CNN after the 2002 elections hehehehe...!

[bt_dooftlook]

Well, according to Mr. maher's logic, Reagan should have said "it's wrong that we pretend that guns commit crimes, or that we treat some guns differently depending on who owns them, or what they look like. It's wrong that politically connected people have access to guns while poor people live in fear of the scourge of unlicensed guns used by criminals to rob and assualt them. From now on, the law of the land will be: All Americans have the right to bear arms (and it's up to them how they want to exercise that right). If they commit a crime with a gun, then they will have to take the consequences."

At least, that's what I think he means by that...



;)

[Kenny Bunk]

Hey, Maher has definitely proven he is an illogical left-wing clymer. But dammit, he has also proven his heart is in the right place. Let us pray that the illumination of reason comes to him, as it did to Dennis Miller.

Miller is still a clymer, too. But he has shown that he now at least understands enlightened self-interest.