I didn't coin these ridiculous terms terms, FITZ. I am merely passing them on. If you note, I wrote "so-called Anglos".
This B.S. is even in the medical literature: Infant-feeding practices among middle-class Anglos and Hispanics.
The way "Anglo" is used nowadays in the U.S., it means a white, American-born, English-speaking person who does not have a Spanish surname. The fact that the so-called "Anglo" could be 100% ethnically German, Polish, Italian, Swedish, Danish, Greek or Lithuanian does not seem to matter.
Now, the way that the American news media labels someone such as myself depends on the situation.
If the article is about how successful my medical practice is, I would be labelled an "Hispanic" or a "Latino".
If the article is about how I did something that the news media totally disapproves of, I would be labelled a "Cuban exile".
If the article is about how I spray-painted racist graffitti on a black man's house, I would be labelled a "white man".
I know you didn't ---- "anglo" is a completely silly word they invented --- at least with "hispanic" most have at least one ancestor who spoke Spanish but maybe nothing else in common. "Anglo" is even more vague because their ancestors may have nothing in common whatsoever.