Replies

Sorry for the long delay. Very busy at work. I got one minute to make a post and had to log out. Then I just got home from grocery shopping. Sandy, you aren't offending me, I just can't understand why you would be surprised by a Defense filing and them calling the evidence wrong.The Defense stating that the DA is demolishing his case is probably standard Defense speak. Even from afar,and without knowing most of the facts, this appears to me, anyway, as a strong case. You may see it as a weak case right now, I just don't. I don't think WE need to look for Prosecutorial wrongs, the Defense will do that every minute. Maggie, thanks for the info on Twist. I had not heard of that dog by name before. You are correct, McAllister's point is truly rediculous. In fact his point, misses the point. They (the Defense) are gonna pick, pick, pick and twist statements around and question motives etc.I'm of the opinion that THEY have trashed their case not the other way around. They have made complete fools of themselves with their theory of the week baloney. Their theories are not even good ones!! Judges, thank God, are familiar with cutting through all verbose fluff and getting to the factual matters.

You may see it as a weak case right now, I just don't.

Don't really know how strong prosecution's case is, CO, but it's probably not the "slam dunk" the state's attorney general said it was. I do believe now that there is a strong possibility that Scott had help, and in the interest of justice, I want any such "help" arrested and tried, too. More specifically, I want to hear from prosecution on Carroll's story. Wonder if they've given him a more detailed LD yet? That story is about 6 weeks old now, IIRC. Maybe we didn't hear it 6 weeks ago, but the DA did.