Mitchell said the exact opposite of what you contend Mitchell said the exact opposite of what you contend. Laci was walking east on La Sombra (Right to Left) then turned north (Up) on Buena Vista and continued walking toward La Loma. Complete opposite direction of Yosemite and the dumpsters. Further the dog was found back at the Peterson house at sometime between 10:10 and 10:17 AM, and there is no telling how long it had been there
Oops, I'm losing it. Make that (Left to Right) on La Sombra ;). As if they were coming from the house in an opposite direction from what Homer says he saw.
No NO NOOOOOOOOOOOO. They are both wrongs.
Walking in neighborhood
Vivian Mitchell said she saw Peterson heading south on Buena Vista heading toward La Sombra Avenue.
"She must have come from Kewin Park," she said. "The dog wanted to head toward Yosemite Boulevard. She circled the dog around, and they headed the other way."
A neighbor later reported finding the dog running loose in the neighborhood about 10:30 a.m., and she placed the dog in the Petersons' back yard.
On Dec. 26, police detectives used bloodhounds trained to track people to try to find Peterson. The dogs led their handlers toward Yosemite Boulevard.
Vivian Mitchell
http://www.modbee.com/reports/laci/story/6274768p-7219758c.htm See ah even put my source
Na what is all this about? Let's see, Mrs Mitchell said the opposite of what I contend.
Ahhh.... I am not contending anything; I don't care where the damn dog lays or when. I don't care about a neighbor, who drove to shop in august and found out she actually did it quicker than on Christmas Eve; She changes the time she on Christmas so (she thinks) the cops kin work a cinch frame on the woman’s husband.
He may have done it but he deserves the same fair trial the constitution guarantees everyone else.
Further Mrs. Mitchell did not say one thing indicative one way or another about my proven fact, that Laci Peterson was alive on Christmas Eve morning. Do you know why?
Because she is the one who originally said that Laci Passed her house 10:00 AM Dec24th. And was told she saw someone else. Mrs. Mitchell knew what she saw b/c Laci passed there all the time. She liked Kerwin Park until she got so pregnant and she always had her golden retriever with her.
Laci Peterson or anyone remotely resembling her ever passed
They’re again. To any fair just minded person tat speaks volumes
It doesn't matter where she was walking. . It’s past all that. The parameters that were working against truth before (The FIX) now are federal evidence, by their guidelines. I can figuratively put Laci anywhere in that park at 10:00AM.
Certainly anywhere that Mrs. Mitchell can see or hear. If you are not a liberal you certainly think and act like one. That is ok by me in fact it's fine. But where do you get do you get those stupid people who you convince by those psuedo logical posits. Two people see a person at a place at about the same time and you get people stupid or lazy enough to believe the weren't there b/c they were walking in the wrong direction.
I kinda liked the dog one too. A pregnant woman is getting murdered; there are eyewitnesses all over, "know" she is there; They hear her scream, and they tell each other; They print leaflets saying she was last seen in the park (Area is park like).
It's 10 Mts. later and now; Bloodhound evidence strongly indicated that the dead woman was alive on the 24th. It had not been applied to the circumstances and distances and other parameters of the eyewitnesses because it led away from the frame IMO. Their story was that it was an impossible match; the dead ladies dog had been back at the house 10 minutes too soon for a prior witness time Therefor the whole thing was impossible. Of course they neglected to say she had changed her arrival time after a time and motion study eight months after the fact. Either way it is specious at best.
Now for now here and federal court forever Laci peterson was alive and at the route that morning.What you and your lib friends need to do now is call a coven meeting and get Brazelton and that Chief to add, pull, create or kill some of the evidence so all those projectionists can get back to climaxing on line. No kidding brazelton is good in his way,but saying he is a good prosecutor is same as saying Dillingeris a good banker.
Oh! RG did ya see that Chicago Tribune Survey on Prosecuorial Misconduct over 30 yearsin Chicago. Look and see what you are a part of if that don't shake ya ya lost! ;-)
That survey is tacked on to my post to CO week or so back. It is a long read but good. By contrast to CA illinois is a picnic, Illinois only has 46% overturn rate CA is 60%.
RG the example walking east on La Sombra she had already been to Yosemite and was going in direction where they grabbed her.
Ray
Been having all kinds of computer trouble sorry for delay
You posted one real GEM in the above post: There is a pregnant woman getting murdered, there are eyewitnesses all over "know" she is there, hear her scream, they tell each other, print Leaflets, Say she was last seen in the Park.!! That is precious because it DOUBLE underscores, the rediculousness of the eyewitness testimony!! I also, remember Mr. Mitchell was certain too because he was watching his favorite show that wasn't on.!! *hands on head, running in circles, screaming here*!! LOL