Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OXENinFLA
So why didn't the President say it was an imminent threat?
46 posted on 10/13/2003 6:38:13 PM PDT by Cacophonous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Cacophonous
So why didn't the President say it was an imminent threat?

maybe because it wasn't? Remember our goal was to stop saddam before he could nuke our troops or Israel, or pass along chem/boi weapons to his terrorist supporters.

61 posted on 10/13/2003 7:13:18 PM PDT by Sci Fi Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: Cacophonous
So why didn't the President say it was an imminent threat?

My inexpert guess is because Dubya was playing it safe.
He's watched enough Republicans get slit due to a a paper trail.

Besides, Dubya may have decided that Saddam's threat was only about as "imminent" as
maybe the couple of hours (to maybe a week) it would take for some chem/bio WMD to be
synthesized and deployed, as per the scenario Kenneth Pollack made before
Operation Iraqi Freedom was launched. And this would also fit with
what inspector David Kay has found so far.
78 posted on 10/13/2003 7:59:00 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson