Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/13/2003 8:23:43 AM PDT by GirlyGirl2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: GirlyGirl2003
He who controls the count controls the vote. 'Nuff said.
2 posted on 10/13/2003 8:34:46 AM PDT by boris (The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Have YOU Donated Yet??

PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Become A Monthly Donor
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

3 posted on 10/13/2003 8:36:03 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GirlyGirl2003
Every intelligence service in the world, and lots of hackers, are going to work diligently to rig our computer voting results.
4 posted on 10/13/2003 8:36:38 AM PDT by Lexington Green (Politician, lawyer, journalist.... when you lie for a living)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: archy; Eastbound
"Road to Civil War" ping.
5 posted on 10/13/2003 8:42:46 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GirlyGirl2003
"It's hard to track down a problem when you go out to your car and the first time it starts, the next time the headlights don't work, the next time you start it the brakes are out, and the next time you start it the door falls off," Behler said. "That's really the way they were."

Sounds like they're running the software on Windows.

6 posted on 10/13/2003 8:44:07 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GirlyGirl2003
I thought we weren't supposed to post articles from Wired.
7 posted on 10/13/2003 8:44:19 AM PDT by Pest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GirlyGirl2003
Electronic Voting sounds like the best thing since The Honorable Richard J.Daley got Chicago's DEAD to vote!!!
10 posted on 10/13/2003 8:50:27 AM PDT by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GirlyGirl2003
Electronic voting machines should only be tools to PRINT a completed ballot. It should not be used to submit electronic ballots.

BTW, what is wrong with this statement:

It was the first time an incumbent governor had not won his second term since Georgia law allowed back-to-back terms in 1978.

11 posted on 10/13/2003 8:55:23 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (I'm normally not a praying man, but if you're up there, please save me Superman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GirlyGirl2003
As for Behler, Williams said he's a disgruntled employee

Does somebody write a script that all beleagured companies use? I mean, this line was so predictable it's pathetic!

13 posted on 10/13/2003 9:02:53 AM PDT by irv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GirlyGirl2003
Interesting.
The RATS pushed for electronic voting, then flaws were found in it.
Wonder how long it will be until they scream that the vote was rigged electronically?
15 posted on 10/13/2003 9:07:33 AM PDT by Darksheare (Good, Bad, I'm the guy with the Nun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GirlyGirl2003; Eastbound; The Westerner; archy; Darksheare
Regarding electronic voting there is an security technique "Blinded Certificates" which works similar to RSA, but lets you do some pretty cool things regarding elections.

Here's how it works:
1) I make out my ballot in a standard format.
2) I blind the it.
3) I give it to authority A and identify myself
4) He checks that I've voted only once and signs it.
5) I unblind it.
6) I turn it in annoymously to authority B via drop-box or onion routing.
7) Authority B knows A has certified this ballot.
8) The unblinded ballots can be published in the paper on or on the web.
ANYONE CAN RECOUNT THEM.
NOBODY KNOWS WHO VOTED WHAT

We have the technology to do this. The main problem is that people have to use thier own trusted computer to ensure security isn't broken, since anyone can create a device that looks like it's letting you vote and then does something else.

I know Germany and Canada just use plain simple check off ballots, and count the things quicker then we do. Many people who were at first excited about electronic voting say we should just get back to the basics.
23 posted on 10/14/2003 1:48:56 AM PDT by Lefty-NiceGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GirlyGirl2003; Eastbound; The Westerner; archy; Darksheare
Regarding electronic voting there is an security technique "Blinded Certificates" which works similar to RSA, but lets you do some pretty cool things regarding elections.

Here's how it works:
1) I make out my ballot in a standard format.
2) I blind the it.
3) I give it to authority A and identify myself
4) He checks that I've voted only once and signs it.
5) I unblind it.
6) I turn it in annoymously to authority B via drop-box or onion routing.
7) Authority B knows A has certified this ballot.
8) The unblinded ballots can be published in the paper on or on the web.
ANYONE CAN RECOUNT THEM.
NOBODY KNOWS WHO VOTED WHAT

We have the technology to do this. The main problem is that people have to use thier own trusted computer to ensure security isn't broken, since anyone can create a device that looks like it's letting you vote and then does something else.

I know Germany and Canada just use plain simple check off ballots, and count the things quicker then we do. Many people who were at first excited about electronic voting say we should just get back to the basics.
24 posted on 10/14/2003 2:05:50 AM PDT by Lefty-NiceGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GirlyGirl2003
The newsgroup comp.risks has more. See Google or us a news reader. Below is the link to message 22.95; message 22.94 has stuff too but isn't in Google yet.


http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&group=comp.risks&selm=CMM.0.90.4.1065824799.risko%40chiron.csl.sri.com
27 posted on 10/14/2003 10:59:15 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson