To: GirlyGirl2003
He who controls the count controls the vote. 'Nuff said.
2 posted on
10/13/2003 8:34:46 AM PDT by
boris
(The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
To: All
Have YOU Donated Yet??
PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
Become A Monthly Donor
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD
3 posted on
10/13/2003 8:36:03 AM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: GirlyGirl2003
Every intelligence service in the world, and lots of hackers, are going to work diligently to rig our computer voting results.
4 posted on
10/13/2003 8:36:38 AM PDT by
Lexington Green
(Politician, lawyer, journalist.... when you lie for a living)
To: archy; Eastbound
"Road to Civil War" ping.
5 posted on
10/13/2003 8:42:46 AM PDT by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: GirlyGirl2003
"It's hard to track down a problem when you go out to your car and the first time it starts, the next time the headlights don't work, the next time you start it the brakes are out, and the next time you start it the door falls off," Behler said. "That's really the way they were." Sounds like they're running the software on Windows.
6 posted on
10/13/2003 8:44:07 AM PDT by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: GirlyGirl2003
I thought we weren't supposed to post articles from Wired.
7 posted on
10/13/2003 8:44:19 AM PDT by
Pest
To: GirlyGirl2003
Electronic Voting sounds like the best thing since The Honorable Richard J.Daley got Chicago's DEAD to vote!!!
To: GirlyGirl2003
Electronic voting machines should only be tools to PRINT a completed ballot. It should not be used to submit electronic ballots.
BTW, what is wrong with this statement:
It was the first time an incumbent governor had not won his second term since Georgia law allowed back-to-back terms in 1978.
11 posted on
10/13/2003 8:55:23 AM PDT by
Lunatic Fringe
(I'm normally not a praying man, but if you're up there, please save me Superman.)
To: GirlyGirl2003
As for Behler, Williams said he's a disgruntled employee Does somebody write a script that all beleagured companies use? I mean, this line was so predictable it's pathetic!
13 posted on
10/13/2003 9:02:53 AM PDT by
irv
To: GirlyGirl2003
Interesting.
The RATS pushed for electronic voting, then flaws were found in it.
Wonder how long it will be until they scream that the vote was rigged electronically?
15 posted on
10/13/2003 9:07:33 AM PDT by
Darksheare
(Good, Bad, I'm the guy with the Nun.)
To: GirlyGirl2003; Eastbound; The Westerner; archy; Darksheare
Regarding electronic voting there is an security technique "Blinded Certificates" which works similar to RSA, but lets you do some pretty cool things regarding elections.
Here's how it works:
1) I make out my ballot in a standard format.
2) I blind the it.
3) I give it to authority A and identify myself
4) He checks that I've voted only once and signs it.
5) I unblind it.
6) I turn it in annoymously to authority B via drop-box or onion routing.
7) Authority B knows A has certified this ballot.
8) The unblinded ballots can be published in the paper on or on the web.
ANYONE CAN RECOUNT THEM.
NOBODY KNOWS WHO VOTED WHAT
We have the technology to do this. The main problem is that people have to use thier own trusted computer to ensure security isn't broken, since anyone can create a device that looks like it's letting you vote and then does something else.
I know Germany and Canada just use plain simple check off ballots, and count the things quicker then we do. Many people who were at first excited about electronic voting say we should just get back to the basics.
To: GirlyGirl2003; Eastbound; The Westerner; archy; Darksheare
Regarding electronic voting there is an security technique "Blinded Certificates" which works similar to RSA, but lets you do some pretty cool things regarding elections.
Here's how it works:
1) I make out my ballot in a standard format.
2) I blind the it.
3) I give it to authority A and identify myself
4) He checks that I've voted only once and signs it.
5) I unblind it.
6) I turn it in annoymously to authority B via drop-box or onion routing.
7) Authority B knows A has certified this ballot.
8) The unblinded ballots can be published in the paper on or on the web.
ANYONE CAN RECOUNT THEM.
NOBODY KNOWS WHO VOTED WHAT
We have the technology to do this. The main problem is that people have to use thier own trusted computer to ensure security isn't broken, since anyone can create a device that looks like it's letting you vote and then does something else.
I know Germany and Canada just use plain simple check off ballots, and count the things quicker then we do. Many people who were at first excited about electronic voting say we should just get back to the basics.
To: GirlyGirl2003
27 posted on
10/14/2003 10:59:15 AM PDT by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson