Skip to comments.
MSNBC Piling On Rush Limbaugh
Biased MSNBC ^
| 10/13/03
| cp124
Posted on 10/13/2003 7:15:32 AM PDT by cp124
I Am Addicted to Prescription Pain Medication
True Confessions: Limbaugh built an army of admirers with his hard-right rants. But off-air, he was a lonely man who may have broken the law to feed his addiction. The real Rush
By Evan Thomas NEWSWEEK
Oct. 20 issue Rush Limbaugh has always had far more followers than friends. Bombastic and clowning on air, shy and bumptious off it, Limbaugh could count on 20 million Dittoheads and talk-radio fans to tune in five days a week. But its hard to find many people who really know him. He was a lonely object of mass adulation, socially ill at ease, at least occasionally depressed and, for the past several years, living in a private hell of pain and compulsion.
http://www.msnbc.com/news/979355.asp?0cv=KA01
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: lovablefuzzball; mediabias; msnbc; pilingon; rushlimbaugh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-105 next last
Piling on continues. The backlash will be breathtaking. MSNBC was doing better when they were trying to attrack conservative viewers.
1
posted on
10/13/2003 7:15:33 AM PDT
by
cp124
To: cp124
And where is Mrs. Rush Limbaugh?
2
posted on
10/13/2003 7:17:59 AM PDT
by
abclily
To: All
Your Donation Helps Counter These Guys
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3
posted on
10/13/2003 7:18:16 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: abclily
What's that mean?
4
posted on
10/13/2003 7:20:15 AM PDT
by
TheConservator
(To what office do I apply to get my tag line back????)
To: abclily
Standing by his side. Good enough for you?
5
posted on
10/13/2003 7:20:34 AM PDT
by
theDentist
(Liberals can sugarcoat sh** all they want. I'm not biting.)
To: cp124
Does this mean, someone actually watchs MSNBC.
6
posted on
10/13/2003 7:22:40 AM PDT
by
cpprfld
(Who said accountants are boring?)
To: cp124
The piling on seems to revolve around Rush's supposed attitude toward illegal drugs. However, I don't recall a lot of "lock 'em up and throw away the key" speeches that the left wing media is not remembering. However, I could be mistaken. Anyone else?
7
posted on
10/13/2003 7:23:25 AM PDT
by
rhombus
To: cp124
I read this stuff and it makes me want to say blah blah blah because that is what it is. It's worse than nonsense!
To: Born Conservative
ping
9
posted on
10/13/2003 7:24:29 AM PDT
by
Pan_Yans Wife
(You may forget the one with whom you have laughed, but never the one with whom you have wept.)
To: cp124
You misunderstand. To the feminized cult of victimology this is the highest veneration. They're making him Saint Rush.
10
posted on
10/13/2003 7:25:55 AM PDT
by
bvw
To: cp124
This is on par with the typical MSNBC journalistic excellence which gets breathtaking viership levels typically under 200,000.
LOL
11
posted on
10/13/2003 7:25:57 AM PDT
by
finnman69
(!)
To: cp124
I particularly find it amusing at how these a--holes whom Rush has been (rightly) trashing over the years are the ones jumping the hardest. It's nothing more than their taking advantage of Rush's dilema to get revenge for their pedantic writing being attacked. I would hope that one of Rush's replacements would point this out and fire back on the show.
12
posted on
10/13/2003 7:28:57 AM PDT
by
GreatOne
(You will bow down before me, Son of Jor-el!)
To: cp124
I don't get the "piling on" and "biased" comments in your post. Is it because MSNBC has the Newsweek article linked? Is it because MSNBC is talking about Rush?
I tend to watch MSNBC in the morning and I find them as fair as anything else on the tube. Has FOX not covered the Rush story?
To: cp124
Please remember that Rush's fate is held in OUR hands not the hands of liberals. We, the listeners, will determine if Rush lives or dies on AM. The liberal media knows this, the liberal trolls on FR know this and they are attempting to "sway" your opinion of Rush since they themselves are powerless to remove him.
Remember this when you are reading a thread like this or listening to some "report" about Rush. YOU the "listener" are the target of the leftists PR. Whether or not you choose to be their willing dupe is up to you.
14
posted on
10/13/2003 7:30:05 AM PDT
by
myself6
(Unionize IT?! "I will stop the motor of the world" - John Galt)
To: rhombus
The only one they have found is from 1995
15
posted on
10/13/2003 7:30:18 AM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
To: cp124
I actually thought this piece was OK. Nothing new, really. It is well known that Rush does better with non face to face communication. Look at how he met his wife. He is solitary. The overeating. All of that paints a picture. It's not that surprising, really.
16
posted on
10/13/2003 7:32:43 AM PDT
by
Huck
To: rhombus
The piling on seems to revolve around Rush's supposed attitude toward illegal drugs. Rush circa 1995-"What this says to me," he told his listeners that day, "is that too many whites are getting away with drug use. Too many whites are getting away with drug sales. Too many whites are getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too."
17
posted on
10/13/2003 7:37:53 AM PDT
by
Capt. Tom
(anything done in moderation shows a lack of interest -Capt. Tom circa 1948)
To: cp124
Duplicate post.
18
posted on
10/13/2003 7:38:51 AM PDT
by
BCrago66
To: rhombus
I don't remember either Rush Limbaugh talking about drugs very much. He rarely talks about gays and the gay agenda. Many of these liberal critics are projecting the harshness of other conservatives onto Rush
19
posted on
10/13/2003 7:41:09 AM PDT
by
dennisw
(G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
To: Capt. Tom
He was wrong, I hope he comes to realize that. Drugs MUST be legal. Regulated, heavily taxed. But somehow available to sane adults at some price.
20
posted on
10/13/2003 7:42:07 AM PDT
by
bvw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-105 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson