Posted on 10/12/2003 7:50:56 PM PDT by WKB
It's difficult to conceive that foreign trade is the biggest issue in the 2003 governor's race in Mississippi since Mississippi governors can't do diddly-squat to change this nation's trade policies.
But Gov. Ronnie Musgrove has chosen to spend a great deal of his time and campaign war chest in talking to the voters of this state about the North American Free Trade Agreement(NAFTA) and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade(GATT).
Musgrove's ads breathlessly tell us that his Republican opponent Haley Barbour supported NAFTA and GATT and hence that he is personally responsible for the Mississippi job losses that NAFTA has in part produced.
At the same time, Musgrove heaps praise upon himself flatly ignoring the strong role of Republican U.S. Sen. Trent Lott and more importantly the $295 million in incentives paid by state taxpayers for luring the Nissan auto plant to Mississippi.
Sorry, you can't have it both ways, Governor. For without congressional approval of new initiatives in the 1947 GATT treaty and the entry of the U.S. into the World Trade Organization in the mid-1990s, there would simply be no Nissan plant in Mississippi.
No GATT, no Nissan. Without broader trade policies and less protectionist trade policies, all that former pasture land in Madison County would still have cows grazing on it.
No GATT, no Nissan
GATT hasn't been an obstacle to new and better jobs in the rural South, it's been a boon. From Atlanta to Dallas along the Interstate 20 corridor, the world's auto industry has created a "new Detroit." Remember free trade?
Has NAFTA cost Mississippi jobs in the short term? Certainly. Mississippi has lost thousands of low wage, low skill jobs many in the garment industry.
But as pointed out in an earlier column, both Democrats and Republicans alike in the White House and on Capitol Hill supported NAFTA. The treaty had the support of Presidents George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton and the majority of Democrats and Republicans in both houses of Congress.
NAFTA opposition?
Gov. Musgrove says he's "always" opposed NAFTA. But when pressed at a recent Clarion-Ledger Editorial Board meeting to produce the first scintilla of evidence that he ever opposed NAFTA as a state senator when the treaty was approved by Congress, he said he couldn't do it.
The difference between Musgrove and Barbour on NAFTA and GATT is that Barbour in the mid-1990s was a national political figure whose opinion on trade was valued by Congress, the White House and international leaders.
At the same time, Musgrove was an obscure Mississippi legislator whose opinion on trade was both publicly unexpressed and sought by no one.
Free trade brought Nissan here
"... This is a wonderful description of what Free Republic really is. It is a living and evolving Life Form to battle the left wingers and those who would destroy this country!
The Free Republic Life Form enables us to discover the truth about what is happening. We can avoid the spin of the major mediots as they work 24/7 to weaken this country. We come to the Free Republic Life Form to find the truth! ...
Free Republic needs a constant infusion of cash to keep the Free Republic Life Form alive, viable and to grow. If we believe in Free Republic, we must donate each month or quarterly to keep this incredible life form alive...
Good stewardship is what this world needs, not good intentions. Good conservative stewards will insure that the Free Republic Life Form continues to grow, be viable and thrives!"
At the same time, Musgrove was an obscure Mississippi legislator whose opinion on trade was both publicly unexpressed and sought by no one."
This is more like it.
I'm gonna remember Sid Salter.
I'm sure he's grateful. ;o)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.