Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Archbishop of Canterbury 'gambles' to heal division over gays -
The Telegraph - UK ^ | October 13, 2003 | Jonathan Petre

Posted on 10/12/2003 5:50:36 PM PDT by UnklGene

Williams 'gambles' to heal division over gays -

By Jonathan Petre, Religion Correspondent (Filed: 13/10/2003)

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, will attempt to prevent the acrimonious collapse of the worldwide Anglican Church at a crisis summit on homosexuality this week by gambling on an appeal to the middle ground.

To placate the conservatives, who are threatening a mass walkout, he will uphold the Church's traditional ban on gay marriages and the ordination of active homosexuals, despite his more liberal private views on the issue. But Dr Williams will resist pressure to expel the liberal American Episcopal Church over its decision to appoint Anglicanism's first openly active homosexual bishop.

According to insiders, he will argue that final decisions about how to deal with liberals who have stepped out of line should be deferred, despite demands by conservatives for immediate action.

The Archbishop could hardly be playing for higher stakes: if the conservatives walk out and set up a rival Church, they could take well over half the 70 million-strong Communion with them and destroy its credibility as an international denomination.

But if the American liberals go their own way, he could lose the wealthiest part of the Communion and huge credibility among his own supporters in England and abroad.

In an appeal to the moderates, the Archbishop will insist that, as he is merely the "first among equals" among his fellow primates, he has no papal-style powers to expel a province.

Such a decision could be taken, however, by a body such as the Anglican Consultative Council, whose membership includes clergy and lay delegates and which could meet in a year's time.

Dr Williams is also expected to argue that the primates need more time to create a mechanism for collective decision-making in the Communion to prevent such a crisis occurring in the future.

The Archbishop's diplomatic skills will be put to the test when the primates - the heads of the 38 autonomous provinces which make up the Communion - gather at Lambeth Palace for a two-day meeting on Wednesday.

The conservatives are furious with the Episcopal Church for defying the views of the vast majority of Anglicans by confirming the appointment as Bishop of New Hampshire of Bishop-elect Gene Robinson, who is divorced and has lived with his male lover for 13 years.

They want Bishop-elect Robinson to withdraw before his consecration next month, just as Canon Jeffrey John, another gay cleric, was forced to step down as Bishop of Reading earlier this year.

They also want disciplinary action taken against the Canadian diocese of New Hampshire, the liberal bishop of which has authorised blessings for same-sex unions. The liberals argue, however, that they have not contravened any world-wide Anglican laws because such laws do not exist.

The Lambeth Conference, which reaffirmed traditional Church teaching on homosexuality in 1998, has moral but no legal force, and they believe that the Communion should permit diversity.

Dr Williams, who has to hold the ring between the opposing sides without any real power, said last week that he was "hopeful rather than optimistic" that he will be able to avert one of the biggest catastrophes in Anglican history.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: aac; crisissummit; episcopal; fallout; homosexualbishop; homosexuality; rowanwilliams; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 10/12/2003 5:50:37 PM PDT by UnklGene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
The Anglicans originally based their whole reason for existence on their ignoring the many Biblical proscriptions on divorce. What's another perversion to wink at?
2 posted on 10/12/2003 5:55:59 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
These Guys Don't Want You To Donate!

Tick them off! Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

3 posted on 10/12/2003 5:57:18 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
LOL, just leave that church altogether. If you want an accurate walk with the Almighty, you're not going to get from a mainline church. Those denominations are all about how to accomodate the world, not about accuracy in following G-d's instructions, per the Bible. I go to an Assembly of God church, but they are one of the few denoms that follow the Bible. My choice before this was always an independent, non-denominational church. If you're going to your church because all your relatives went to it, you are almost certainly in error.

I read a book in the early 80s, about how all the mainline churches have written precepts that directly contradict the Bible. The worst offenders were the Catholics, who I can hardly consider Christian. But alas, also my Southern Baptist cong had many errors as well. Although I have modified my views about denom churches, I still believe that the vast majority are in error in many areas. If you want the most accurate walk with Him, an independent Baptist or Pentecostal congregation will be the best. There are of course isolated exceptions to that, but they are very, very few in number.....

4 posted on 10/12/2003 5:59:56 PM PDT by Malcolm (not on the bandwagon, but not contrary for contrary's sake either)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malcolm
Wrong post in the wrong place. I don't think posts announcing that religions other than yours are theologically errant, except on the Religion thread. Take you stuff there. As one who subscribes to no religion, this poster does not appreciate such comments on the general interest forum.
5 posted on 10/12/2003 6:03:13 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Wrong post in the wrong place. I don't think posts announcing that religions other than yours are theologically errant [are appropriate], except on the Religion thread. Take you stuff there. As one who subscribes to no religion, this poster does not appreciate such comments on the general interest forum.


6 posted on 10/12/2003 6:04:52 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Malcolm
LOL, just leave that church altogether. If you want an accurate walk with the Almighty, you're not going to get from a mainline church. Those denominations are all about how to accomodate the world, not about accuracy in following G-d's instructions, per the Bible. I go to an Assembly of God church, but they are one of the few denoms that follow the Bible. My choice before this was always an independent, non-denominational church. If you're going to your church because all your relatives went to it, you are almost certainly in error.

I tend to agree in that I prefer independent, non-denominational churches, and that a lot of denominations are ridden with dogma, but it's not really fair to say that mainline denominations are into accomodating the world. Sure, it's an unfortunately common sight, but I have attended Southern Baptist, Methodist, and Anglican churches that were TOTALLY into Christ and had a real heart for reaching out to people.

7 posted on 10/12/2003 6:07:23 PM PDT by MegaSilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Malcolm
You'll forgive those of us who don't find your proclamations on theology to be inerrant.
8 posted on 10/12/2003 6:07:48 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Malcolm
Speak the TRUTH Malcolm and ignore that seek to intimidate and malign you on this forum. You have every much right to speak out as that SELF APPOINTED THREAD COP.
9 posted on 10/12/2003 6:08:42 PM PDT by TrueBeliever9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
Trying to walk the fence never works. The man needs to take a stand and lead rather than try to gloss over the problem. The biggest stumbling block is probably his own liberal views on the topic.
10 posted on 10/12/2003 6:09:18 PM PDT by Exigence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
As one who subscribes to no religion, this poster does not appreciate such comments on the general interest forum.

"Subscribing to no religion" is, like it or not, a religious viewpoint. What gives you the idea that your religious viewpoint is the only one allowed in public life? It's certainly not a conservative notion, now is it?

11 posted on 10/12/2003 6:11:25 PM PDT by Exigence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TrueBeliever9; Malcolm
For those of you who are not in main line denominations, I respectfully remind you that mainline denominations like the Methodists and the Presbyterians were once considered dissenters and out of the main stream.

Look to your own churches, as you could also fall into the trap of those who are currently having difficulties.

It is not very helpful to throw stones at those who are trying to stand up to evil. I would think you would be encouraging traditional Episcopalians, rather than mocking them.

12 posted on 10/12/2003 6:15:08 PM PDT by Miss Marple (Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Exigence
Well I don't hawk my non believer status, and suggest the faithful are errant. I just note that I have not been blessed with a leap of faith. So the comparison is apples and oranges.
13 posted on 10/12/2003 6:19:45 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I am defending the right of this poster to post and post what he wants to post - that is academic and a debate! Seeking to intimidate someone and tell them they have no right to their opinion is not appropriate ever!
14 posted on 10/12/2003 6:20:01 PM PDT by TrueBeliever9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
A Final Thought:

No chance the ArchDruid will actually take a biblical stance and kick the poofster bishop and his live in sodomite out of the church and tell the church that any Anglican upset over the decision can take a walk too.

The ArchWeasel will try to weasel his way out. Conservative better either mean business here or get use to a church that is indistinguishable from the Jerry Springer Show.
15 posted on 10/12/2003 6:21:54 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Well I don't hawk my non believer status...

Actually, you just did.

16 posted on 10/12/2003 6:22:09 PM PDT by Exigence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Look to your own churches, as you could also fall into the trap of those who are currently having difficulties.

I have belonged to the same church for over a quarter of a century - when it begins to teach doctrine contrarty to THE WORD OF GOD as in the BIBLE - I will be out the door very fast!

17 posted on 10/12/2003 6:22:18 PM PDT by TrueBeliever9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TrueBeliever9
Everyone has a right to his opinion. I have no quarrel with that.

I am simply pointing out that NO denomination or non-denominational church has the corner on error-free theology. ALL can fall into error, as I have seen happen with a non-denominational church in my area.

I simply think it is best not to criticize Episcopalians who are doing the best that they can. And I also don't think that saying that if your parents and grandparents went to the same church that you do you are automatically in error. When YOUR granchildren go to your church, will you suddenly feel that you are in error?

18 posted on 10/12/2003 6:24:17 PM PDT by Miss Marple (Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Exigence
I am not trying to sell it, I just announced it in the interests of full disclosure. Malcolm is welcome to say whatever he wants in the religion forum on this site. And since I almost never flag the mods, he can do it here if he so chooses unless a mod drops by and agrees with me. But I don't approve. It does not serve any useful purpose IMO.
19 posted on 10/12/2003 6:24:28 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
When YOUR granchildren go to your church, will you suddenly feel that you are in error?

HUH?

Frankly, I just pray that my grandchildren find the LORD! Anywhere!

20 posted on 10/12/2003 6:26:18 PM PDT by TrueBeliever9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson