[republicanwizard]

Let me try to unconvince you.

Arlen Specter was a District Attorney who was in charge of one the largest criminal caseload in the country. How could he, in all honesty, vote in a criminal trial in which no evidence was presented. Does not the Constitution call for witnesses, etc? Specter, as an honest man, had no choice to vote not proven in that fraud. He didn't say Clinton was not guilty. He simply said it was not proven, and it wasn't, in the constitutional sense.

[LdSentinal]

Didn't Arlen Specter defend that murdering leftie, Ira Einhorn?