Replies

He was also President Bush's spear-thrower on Homeland Security, and he saved the nomination of Clarence Thomas with his skills at exposing liar.

If he voted not proven on impeachment, then I congratulate him. No man who served as District Attorney of Philadelphia could have voted guilty or not guilty in a sham trial which called no witnesses. How could anyone vote guilty or not guilty in right conscience?

I would have opposed Bork for the same reason I oppose Lott. I don't like naive Republicans.

I'll be proud to support Senator Arlen Specter for a fifth term in the United States Senate!

Another reason I don't like Specter -- he refused to go to the mat for Bush during the 2000 recount. A CNN debate featured John Breaux demanding that the votes be recounted, while Specter refused to even endorse the Republicans' position. I believe that Specter is a good man, but he is the epitome of wishy-washy politically correct moderation. I applaud him for going to the mat for Clarence Thomas, but his support of Clinton and opposition to Bork equal a man who is more in line with Daschle than with Bush.

As long as we're on the subject of primary challenges, I wish to begin to campaign to get rid of John McCain. I hope you're not a fan of his too, Wiz.