Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: ER_in_OC,CA
I doubt Hollings is vulnerable. What about Murray?
10 posted on 11/07/2002 12:33:07 PM PST by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lasereye
I doubt Hollings is vulnerable.

I think he has to be considered a prime target. He'll be a couple months shy of 83 years old in November 2004 (not that that ever hurt Strom Thurmond!), he drew less than 53% of the vote last time, he's made some very negative (and downright silly) comments about President Bush these last couple years, and Bush himself will be on the ballot in a strong GOP state. I would expect 2004 to be Hollings' toughest challenge yet (assuming a strong challenger, of course).

11 posted on 11/07/2002 12:47:31 PM PST by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: lasereye
He was vulnerable in 1998, but he won't be in 2004?

Carroll Campbell declined to run (he wanted to make his millions to take care of his family-- children and grandchildren), but was leading in all the polls.
31 posted on 11/07/2002 5:37:54 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: lasereye
I doubt Hollings would even run.
78 posted on 11/11/2002 10:32:37 PM PST by Fledermaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson