Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Judges Criticize Supreme Court for Overturning Decisions with Emergency Rulings
FoxNews ^ | Anders Hagstrom

Posted on 09/04/2025 9:40:49 AM PDT by FlipWilson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: FlipWilson
A group of anonymous federal judges

This means the NBC reporters made it all up.

41 posted on 09/04/2025 1:26:21 PM PDT by T Ruth (Mohammedanism shall be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

they are not anonymous

just look at their rulings

who will be impeached first


42 posted on 09/04/2025 4:26:34 PM PDT by joshua c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

They are doing this to try and sway the SCOTUS decisions in their direction.

They have a lot of damn nerve. I don’t think anymore we can save this country by voting only. These people have no respect for the voting process. They all scream democracy but their democracy is only what puts the sick ideology of the left in power.


43 posted on 09/04/2025 4:30:23 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15
Should the Dems ever regain power and appoint a new majority to SCOTUS, it will take them 5 minutes to re-instate Roe and invalidate Heller, Bruen and whatever other 2nd Amendment cases are out there.

What you’re describing is essentially judicially enforced rule by edict, where judges or courts act as the primary source of law or authority, rather than legislatures or democratic processes. This is sometimes referred to as judicial authoritarianism or, in extreme cases, judicial fiat.

Gavin Newsom can do this by packing the court if he is able to capture the White House in 2028.

44 posted on 09/04/2025 4:34:22 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Congress controls the makeup and purvue of the lower courts.

Where are they?


45 posted on 09/04/2025 4:41:09 PM PDT by Fledermaus ("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dalberg-Acton

Silly comment.

Don’t you really think it’s entrely conceivable that, say, Judge Boasberg (who was slapped down unceremoniously by SCOTUS) might be involved?

Boasberg is probably the ringleader


46 posted on 09/05/2025 6:04:26 AM PDT by Old West Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Too bad. Live with it.

It’s NOT your job to control or set policy for the USSC.


47 posted on 09/12/2025 11:42:24 AM PDT by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson
A group of anonymous federal judges ....

Should NOT be allowed to exist. If they're going to make public statements criticizing the USSC, anonymity should NOT even be an option.

48 posted on 09/12/2025 3:03:02 PM PDT by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson