[PAR35]

As long as the taxpayers aren’t supporting them, I’ll be a libertarian on the issue.

On the other hand, three or more and the taxpayers are paying for them, I’m a fan of involuntary sterilization. But being the good liberal that I am, I’d enforce that rule for both male and females.

[Tell It Right]

Just get rid of the welfare, problem solved, without us having to get into each other's business.

As someone who's both a Christian and a libertarian (at least in terms of most social issues as long as it's consenting adults), the best overall policy is for the gubment to stay out of each other's business, and for us Christians to win over hearts and minds by loving God, loving others, and living holy lives. In due time, people dealing with the natural consequences of hedonism will realize our way of life is best and want to take on our ways voluntarily.

[Captain Peter Blood]

You can bet she collecting benefits on all those kids.

[T.B. Yoits]

As long as the taxpayers aren’t supporting them, I’ll be a libertarian on the issue.

There is no room for accepting this. If just a few women do this, the chances of their offspring being directly related to each other without knowing it increases exponentially. The genetic defects from such inbreeding could victimize generations.

[GaryCrow]

As long as the taxpayers aren’t supporting them, I’ll be a libertarian on the issue.

Of course the taxpayers are supporting them, where do you think she's getting the money to support them? If you think she or any of the ghetto thugs she screwed to have these kids are paying for them then I want some of what you're smoking.