I listen to Walsh when I’m in the car late at night. He’s generally spot-on, and I’d really like to see him still be a Congressman.
However, in this particular case, I think that he’s wrong. First and foremost because the same exact report that he’s referencing said on numerous occasions that there was literally no evidence of any kind of collusion. That, of course, completely ignores the fact that “collusion” is not a federal crime for anyone, anywhere. The ONLY thing that Trump could have done with the Russians (or any other foreigner) that would have violated the law would have been to accept campaign contributions from them (kind of like Billy Jeff Blythe did in 1996, via some cut-out companies, from the Red Chinese - in return for allowing Loral to sell them advanced guidance technology for rockets). But Trump was guilty of NOTHING - ZIP, ZILCH, NADA, NIENTE. So WTF else could he have done wrong - obstruct an investigation into nothing by being angry at the false accusations, and wanting to fire people engaged in what can only be called a coup attempt?
Walsh is barking up the wrong tree here. How about closing ranks around the ONLY guy who actually has tried to keep his promises, who is ACTUALLY appointing Constitutionalists to the federal courts, who cut taxes and regulations massively, and who is fighting hard for us on trade and immigration policy? What, 9 out of 10 isn’t good enough for Walsh? What a short-sighted putz!
Walsh is being either paid or intimidated to pee on this tree.