Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) framed the Senates decision simply, days before the final vote: It is about whether or not a woman who has been a victim at some point in her life is to be believed.
Bingo! She was NOT believed, and those who say they DO believe are sexist to think so. There was nothing credible about her, and anyone with a sense of decency and objectivity would have noticed that.
Not to mention her obvious political bias and “activism”
If anyone is to blame here, it’s Fraud and the Democrats and fellators like you.
But then again, I bet you thought the Duke Lacrosse young men were guilty, as well as countless other men who have been unjustly accused and imprisoned for rape, etc.
It is about whether or not a woman who has been a victim at some point in her life is to be believed.
A perfect tautology
—Since we believe that she is a victim, we conclude that she is a victim.
—Since we conclude that she is a victim, she is to be believed.
Or more simply stated, we believe she is a victim, because we believe she is a victim. QED.
I wonder if Murkowski has ever read the book of Genesis. Does she think Joseph was guilty just because Potiphar’s wife said he was?