I'm not quite sure how to parse your statement. Is this correct?
Corrections or confirmation, please.
1. Argentine submarine went missing on a cruise off the coast of Argentina and declared lost even after search
2. Sub was of German design and build as are Israeli ones
3. Netanyahu when under investigation mentioned that Mossad or Israeli agencies had their own sub(s) in article printed in Israeli press
4. Specifications of TLBM developed/modified by Israel for their fleet matches diameter etc for sub from Argentina as they are from the same shipyard
5. Launch was not from site in NK but offshore near Japan
6. Evidence including photos shows actual missile destruction and no indication that it was ICBM
7. Submarine lost by Argentina was captured by our folks, pictures were on a QAnon post from Q info
8. Watch the Snowden movie, he mentions (as he developed it) the system to protect sensitive data fromal l resources for NSA et all in the event of a major event that could cause loss
9. Missile launch was known before hand by White Hats and intercept was done by US vessels in Pacific
10. Missile info was provided to Hawaiian personnel and they hit the button and announced incoming and data protection plan went into effect, data flowed and intercept by White Hats to get “full copy” including info on Eric Schmidt & Google and other things
11. Shoot down by Aegis missiles, witnessed by people out on the ocean miles offshore and photographed as well
Stand down issued but data was captured
12. Information provided on “failure” or shootdown took down alarm state by Authorities who did not know our team had it all
13. Info on Sub design & Specs avail online as well as TLBM developed by Israel from other countries IP and modified including length, diameter and capability of Argentine sub to utilize