Keep in mind that, at one point in history, MOST people thought the earth was flat.
One person stood against the MOST. Turns out, he had the truth of it and MOST were full of dooky.
The truth is not democratic.
Think about it.
Bagster
Keep in mind that, at one point in history, MOST people thought the earth was flat.
One person stood against the MOST. Turns out, he had the truth of it and MOST were full of dooky.
The truth is not democratic.
Think about it.
Bagster
Stating a fact of public acceptance doesn’t necessarily indicate agreement. Why enter the arena if you aren’t prepared against the first attack?
Surely, you realize that most people don’t follow FReeq threads? Whether true or not, much of the topics are unknown to many, and will be virulently attacked. The Chans and Reddit forums follow a model that is foreign to most here. Though they often lead FR in content and analysis, the non-linear approach, filled with meandering twistings and dead ends, is almost incomprehensible to many traditional readers. Looked at literally, their patterns are indistinguishable from conspiracy sites.
Following information and disinformation can result in no other result. That’s why so much disinformation is put out. Obfuscation and vilification are intentional. The closer one gets to truth; the more obfuscation. Associating real fact with conspiracy theories is standard operating procedure. Trying to outshout the chorus only makes it worse.
Not all who wander are lost; not all who wear black are enemies.