[Nicojones]

Hopefully this isn’t too late. Many of the more recent polls have the dem in the lead now. How that can be in this reddish district is beyond me.

[JLAGRAYFOX]

My kind advice to you is that you should never trust any political polls. As we have seen and witnessed time after time, they are simply rigged or weighted by the pollsters and their Democrat, left-wing, political bent.

Your most recent evidence of this poll farce reporting is the Texas Primary. For goodness sake, we were told...Texas is going “Deep Blue”. Actually, it went the other way, big time to “Trump Red”!!!

Bottom Line: As always, the win game secret, is “Voter Turnout, Voter Turnout & More Voter Turnout”. Folks, support out great POTUS, Trump and on Next Tuesday, turnout and cast your vote for Republican, Rick Saccone!!! Go....MAGA!!!

[napscoordinator]

Horrible that this has to be done at all with a district that went 20 percent higher for trump then Clinton.

[BikerJoe]

How that can be in this reddish district is beyond me.

Being from the area and in the party, I can say that I think the conference might have made a mistake selecting Saccone. The district spans parts of four counties. Southern Allegheny county (Pittsburgh area) is fairly dem and liberal and is a major part of the district. One of the candidates was a young Republican state senator who has managed to win repeatedly in that area, but the conference decided against him and chose Saccone. I like Saccone, but never felt he could carry or overcome that area. I hope I'm wrong.

[Conserv]

Really? I’ve seen exactly one poll that had the dem in the lead.