Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/01/2017 2:42:06 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hey Kristin, pollsters have proven themselves to be dishonest. That is why I always lie to them.


55 posted on 09/02/2017 2:06:24 AM PDT by AdaGray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

>> Article: people like her, who want a party that marries support for less government and robust national defense with a commitment to racial and social inclusion.

That is indeed a totally #’d up statement by the author.


56 posted on 09/02/2017 2:15:37 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

bfl


57 posted on 09/02/2017 2:57:09 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The portion of the party coalition willing to tolerate, if not actively embrace, white nationalism “is larger than most mainstream Republicans have ever been willing to grapple with,” she added.

Absolute reeking bullsh-t. Turn off CNN, you moron. Somebody call the "waaaaaahmbulance"!

If this ignorant—um, brat—is going to buy into the Propaganda Media's phony narrative—and it is 100% "Fake News"—there's not a d-mn thing we can do about it.

This just illustrates that some people are excessively susceptible to propaganda. This woman is proof positive of Goebbels statement that "if you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it". As such, it's up to her to realize that she's been played for a fool, instead of taking her cues from people and sources which are—to put it bluntly—lying sacks of sh-t...

58 posted on 09/02/2017 9:12:30 AM PDT by sargon ("If we were in the midst of a zombie apocalypse, the Left would protest for zombies' rights.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Now she is wondering whether Donald Trump’s GOP has a place for people like her, who want a party that marries support for less government and robust national defense with a commitment to racial and social inclusion.

This statement captures the confusion that the PC mandates have foisted on those who find half thought out shibboleths appealing. Just what is this "inclusion" supposed to entail?

Presently, inclusion is being interpreted to rule out the continuity of moral, cultural & American ethnic values in favor of everyone walking on eggs--as it were--not to offend anyone else. In other words inclusion is not inclusive; does not encourage mutual respect or anything which might even hint at being inclusive. But it is absolutely sacrosanct as a term, which few dare reject.

Here is an example of how "inclusion" works in the mega high tech world, today:

Absurdity At Google.

59 posted on 09/02/2017 9:25:35 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Upset that whites voted Republican... She’s a winner.


60 posted on 09/02/2017 3:46:42 PM PDT by SaraJohnson ( Whites must sue for racism. It's pay day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson