Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It is not fair at all that those who choose to live more healthy in their lifestyle must bear the brunt of costs for those who choose to smoke, drink, drug, and self-abuse themselves into chronic illness (and health care costs).

But what is most frustrating of all - not a single plan put forward has done a SINGLE thing to address the REASONS for the skyrocketing healthcare costs (with or without ObamaCare).


2 posted on 06/29/2017 9:56:00 AM PDT by TheBattman (Gun control works - just ask Chicago...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TheBattman

Well, one thing they could do is to make those damn drug ads illegal. I only watch Fox News these days, but I swear that 75% of the ads are for some drug or another. Evidently the medical profession / drug companies won’t rest until EVERY American is hooked on one (or preferably more) drugs, and run to their Doctor for every imaginable test (so they can get hooked on MORE drugs).

It’s vile, and it’s GOT to be causing an up-tick in Doctor visits (and consequently insurance costs).


7 posted on 06/29/2017 10:06:25 AM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: TheBattman

That kind of action cannot be done with the reconciliation approach. It would require 60 votes in the Senate which aren’t there at this time.


10 posted on 06/29/2017 10:07:05 AM PDT by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: TheBattman
It is not fair at all that those who choose to live more healthy in their lifestyle must bear the brunt of costs for those who choose to smoke, drink, drug, and self-abuse themselves into chronic illness (and health care costs).

Group coverage, including the older more private style, has that as an inherent feature. BTW, you left out male homosexual acts, which are more destructive medically and costly to treat than all those others put together.

The smokers are getting hit by most employer coverage, if tat makes you feel better. What they take in healthcare coverage (which is debatable, as a 90 year-old with alzheimers is just as expensive as a smoker who gets cancer at a younger age), the smoker gives some of it back by losing out on a decade of Social Security.
11 posted on 06/29/2017 10:08:03 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: TheBattman

Excellent comment ... to which I add my rant:

So when did the single phase campaign promise of “repeal ObamaCare” morph into “repeal and replace ObamaCare”? Why replace it at all? Repeal ObamaCare now in toto, root and branch, all of it. Close and disband any and all bureaus, departments, offices, etc that were created to support any part of ObamaCare. Terminate any and all personnel in those departments hired to implement ObamaCare.

If there must be a ‘replace’ phase to this endeavor, let it be to create a few simple guidelines (not laws) supporting free market driven system ie: allow cross-states sales & marketing, limit malpractice awards, streamline FDA drug testing and approval system, etc.

Unfortunately the truth is that once the Feds seize a power from the states and/or the people, the only way to separate any politician from that power involves a rope and a tree.


37 posted on 06/29/2017 11:09:22 AM PDT by ByteMercenary (Healthcare Insurance is *NOT* a Constitutional right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: TheBattman

The problem with your statement is “those who choose to live more healthy”. First, medical science is often wrong about diets and what is “healthy”. Second, how do you judge “healthy enough”? Should we require daily exercise to cover people? How much exercise is enough? Do we count daily calories or judge nutritious content? Third, there’s no perfect solution so saying “not fair” has little meaning.

I get what you’re saying but unless we suppress liberty we’ll always have this as a consequence.

To your second point about cost reductions, I completely agree...it’s very curious and smells like a swamp. Too many dirty influences.


44 posted on 06/29/2017 11:58:38 AM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson