We differ on one thing. I WOULD NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE ASSUME THE ALLEGATIONS WERE TRUE. Whatever happened to “Innocent until PROVEN guilty?” It USED TO BE the foundation of our justice system. Its eems that our current population would rather go along with anything a journalist says in preference to turning on their own thought processes.
Donald Trump has been a celebrity for decades. Why have there not been dozens of attacks on him before he ran for the presidency? Look at the creeps attacking him. WHERE ARE YOUR BRAINS, PEOPLE??????????????????
Mollypitcher,
You are absolutely correct!
Tedbel,
In America we are innocent until proven guilty.
The media and the DNC are in cahoots and conspire to trash Republican candidates with cr@p allegations.
That’s how they roll.
Oh, and by the way FR rules say not to except articles from ones own blog.
That’s why I posted the rest of the article.
> I WOULD NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE ASSUME THE ALLEGATIONS WERE TRUE.
I don’t assume it but sometimes you have to stipulate something like that to get a discussion going. “let’s assume it’s true for this discussion and talk about who will do the best for the country in the future”. If you want to win the allegations argument first you’ll never get to the “who’s best” argument.
> Whatever happened to “Innocent until PROVEN guilty?”
That’s a limit on the government, not me. I personally am sure Hillary is guilty and should be in jail. Nothing forces me to assume she’s innocent until proven otherwise.