Posted on 09/09/2016 8:34:34 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
The actual report itself gives the numbers, as well as percentages, might should have just linked straight to it and avoided the commentary from the other site??
If you look at all the choices of answers they had, the low 250 number somehow did not seem as important to me, as it initially did when I read your comment, they had plenty of outs.
I would like to know what sort of medical background they had probably, i.e. hoping not all a bunch of dermatologists, podiatrists and pediatricians, but hey, glad they participated! Don't think it can hurt our cause...
"HilLIARy for Prison 2016"
Proctologists would be closer to the mark.
“250 doctors polled.
Is the size of the sample worth the effort ?”
“what if they are all podiatrists ?”
They were most likely psychiatrists!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.