Look I am as pessimistic as they come but I don’t think that battleground review is the correct picture. Basically all the OH polls have been tied in RCP so why give it to Hillary with no toss-ups? PA’s last two have been suspect. Suffolk’s methodology for Hillary’s was shocking as I found out on this site that the poll would ask for the youngest voter in the household. Trump led in the last poll in JUNE in AZ. Trump was down just 3 in MI before the RNC convention. Trump was up by 1 and before that 3 in IA again before the convention. All of these from the same RCP source.
Also add in Axiom Strategies’ Battleground County polls which Trump is strongly ahead in all but one county (again all of these before the RNC).
http://axiomstrategies.com/abc/
So not sure why all those battlegrounds are put in the Hillary column in the no toss ups map.
Now don’t get me wrong we’ve since had the DNC convention and there are now over three months until the election and a lot can and probably will happen but just don’t understand why the assumption would be to put those (and other states) states so assuredly in Hillary’s column.
Have no idea either just reporting what is available. Have no idea why so many people believed DJT will win with no ground game, against a long prepared foe which has no problem cheating on a massive scale - hope, I suppose ...
She probably gave orders to skew the results to show her ahead. I don’t think she takes it lightly that she is behind or on election day giving her concession speech. She’ll probably want a recount.