60% of EVERYONE dislikes Trump.
That's 6/10.
That's 3/5.
60% Hillary vs 40% Trump is a BLOWOUT.
You just hang on to your delusions, though.
Dems had 367,000 show up vs 737,000 GOP.
You might want to fix that adding machine of yours.
That's 6/10.
That's 3/5.
60% Hillary vs 40% Trump is a BLOWOUT
Thank you, Eyedigress, and to elaborate on your comments vs. Washi:
Funny, I had a hard time finding the actual numbers of voters in South Carolina for Hillary. Seems all the news sources only want to report percentages for the Dim race. Imagine that.
But a little persistence paid off. It seems Trump got fewer total votes than Hillary in his respective primary in SC (271k to his 238k), where Hillary campaigned heavily (reflected in her lopsided percentages vs. daBern).
But that's only half the story. The TOTAL number of votes between the two Dims was about 271,500 plus 96,000 equaling around 367,500.
The total among the Republicans was 238,000 plus 168,000 plus 164,000 plus 57,000 plus 56,000 plus 53,000, equals about 733,000. Again, the Dim TOTAL was about 367,500.
That's almost exactly a TWO TO ONE TURNOUT RATIO in SC, Republicans to Dims.
So, at least in SC, unless you're stupid enough, or brainwashed-by-the-disinfomedia enough to think a vast majority of non-Trump voters will refuse to vote for Trump AND THEN cross over to vote for Clinton then SC is the exact OPPOSITE of a "blowout" for Hildebeast.
Put another way, only 1 in 15 (33,000 of 495,000) non-Trump voters in SC would have to vote for him in the general election to equal Hildebeast's votes.
Trump is more popular with GOP voters today than he was six months ago. He's almost unique in his ability to substantially improve his approval rating, something pollsters call impossible.
You're using the arguments that apply to losers like Jeb, Mitt and McCain to an unprecedented movement candidate, the GOP's own version of Obama.
Trump will crush anyone they put up against him.