I doubt it, and it's a very bad idea to start an argument by making an assertion that you have no way of knowing. I was born in 1947, how about you, babe?
Studying and understanding the Constitution is two very different things. But, since the Constitution is silent on this point, the document itself will not be must use. I'd be happen to discuss why the founders were concerned about this issue, and how the courts have ruled over the years. Interestingly, they have never considered the specific question as regards the eligibility of candidates to the Office of the President, so this argument cannot be resolved. No doubt, that's the kind of argument that you must like.
Impress me.
Cruz “character”:
1. Phony summonses mailed out, scaring people to vote for Cruz.
2. Claiming Carson quit, presinc captains told voters “vote for Cruz”
3. Campaigning in the 800 churches, showing video “vote for me” with his preacher/father stomping for him. Rafael Cruz is a 7 Mountain Dominionist and believes his son is the anointed one.
4. “Brilliant” lawyer, did not know he was Canadian citizen and that he is not Natural Born Citizen, not eligible for office of P or VP.
5. Making phony video advertising with lies about opponents.
6. Phony video about Rubio - Obama.
7. 7 Mountain Dominionist Church = Christian???
Just enough to beat Trump in IA, apologize, rinse and repeat?
Liar is the polite term for this Cuban. His father was pro-communist in Cuba, imprisoned by Batista, but now he is refugee?
IRREFUTABLE AUTHORITY HAS SPOKEN
(Oct. 18, 2009) The Post & Email has in several articles mentioned that the Supreme Court of the United States has given the definition of what a “natural born citizen” is. Since being a natural born citizen is an objective qualification and requirement of office for the U.S. President (and VP), it is important for all U.S. Citizens to understand what this term means.
http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/18/4-supreme-court-cases-define-natural-born-citizen/
Applies to Cruz and Rubio, both at the time not born to US citizens and on US soil.
You lose. I remember Dec. 7, 1941 and obviously you don’t. Thhe Constitution is not silent on the Law of Nations as it is cited in Article 1, section 8. The same Law of nations was the source of Natural Born Citizen as well as many other things in the Declaration of independence and the Constitution. Do your own research and read Vattel and all the Supreme court Decisions based on Vattel’s Law of
Nations as well as the numerous references to it in the writings of George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, John Jay, James Madison, David Ramsey, Tom Paine and many others ALL referring to the Law of Nations. Ramseys dissertation on Citizenship page 6 could not be clearer. Try the Powdered Wig Society, KrisAnne Hall, Minor vs Happersett and when you’ve finished with that list I’ll give you another..
i understand what i study. you should study a little before you take an indefensable stance.
how the courts have ruled over the years. Interestingly, they have never considered the specific question as regards the eligibility of candidates to the Office of the President, so this argument cannot be resolved. No doubt, that’s the kind of argument that you must like.
............................................................
TheCourts HAVE considered the question of citizenship and therein lies the fault in your argument. I do not intend to spend any more time discussing this with you as you prefer to remain uneducated and hide behind snarky responses as if the constitution does not matter. ONE exmple: Minor vs Happersett in the Supreme Court 1875 finds that BOTH PARENTS must be American citizens. Look it up! I dare you. Therefore neither Cruz nor Rubio are eligible.