If signatures are not valid, then it is acting within the law, by the very language and purpose of the election laws of a particular state, to contest questionable or provably fraudulent signatures. There is nothing “crooked” about doing so.
If there were an issue with Democrats having invalid signatures, then how many here would oppose vetting such?
The same people who demand voter ID laws cannot now protest what is essentially the same form of validation when it comes to putting a candidate on a state’s ballot. To object at such a move is to be disingenuous and intellectually dishonest.
Not only that, but this action strongly suggests that Trump will fight vote fraud. He ought to fire his Illinois guy though for not making duplicates and then being so late in actually filing, he did not have time to make duplicates.
“If signatures are not valid, then it is acting within the law, by the very language and purpose of the election laws of a particular state, to contest questionable or provably fraudulent signatures. There is nothing “crooked†about doing so.”
******
But the point here wasn’t about making it fair or questioning possible fraudulent signatures. It was about doing it just before the time ran out so they couldn’t get any more in under the time limit. Trump is for Trump and screw anyone (that includes his supporters) that stand in his way