Rand Paul Preparing To Go After Trump In The Debate: ‘I Think He Deserves Both Barrels’

The Daily Caller ^ | September 15, 2015 | Alex Pappas, Political Reporter

[LadyBuck]

“He’s the consummate insider,” Paul said, “buying and selling politicians.”

AKA...johns, prostitutes and pimps.

At least one DC trough-feeder finally admits it, despite the stunning lack of introspection and awareness of his hypocrisy.

Dear Rand, my contribution to your campaign is going to be a MIRROR.

[I Hired Craig Livingstone]

Hear, hear! Perfectly said. May I steal that for a tagline?

[867V309]

“He’s the consummate insider,” Paul said, “buying and selling politicians.”

El Stupido doesn't understand the difference between "buying" and "being bought."

[US_MilitaryRules]

Wow! Threatening someones life?

[VanDeKoik]

Trump basically knew what type of women these politicians were.

All he did was negotiate the price for the exchange.

[MortMan]

Trump CAN be outgunned.

But it will take a brash, I-don’t-care, rock-ribbed conservative stand by a candidate to do it. Out of all of those in the running, only Cruz has the conservative cred to pull it off - and even he has a couple of black marks in some folks’ copy books.

Rand Paul (or anyone else) trying to outgun Trump by tearing him down will not work, except in the already convinced media and candidate pools.

And, no, I am not an outspoken Trump supporter. Far from it.

[Irenic]

Ha! Good one.

[Vendome]

You wanna fight Trump?

You can’t even fight sleep...

Putz...

[LadyBuck]

Yup yup

[plain talk]

“When it’s time to shoot, just shoot, don’t talk” (paraphrase)

[freedomlover]

[Lurkinanloomin]

Sure, I’d be honored.

[Lurkinanloomin]

The GOP is determined to force another amnesty candidate on us. Trump is far from perfect, but at least he is on the side of the citizens and the rule of law. That is more than can be said of most of the rest

[Charles Henrickson]

I do believe that Trump needs to be exposed as the shallow, unqualified, egotistical liberal that he is, and if Paul can help perform that needed service, fine. But that doesn’t mean I support Paul, either. He may be too much like his looney dad.

[I Hired Craig Livingstone]

A lot of us did. This campaign is unmasking these guys for who they really are. Unfortunately, it’s almost uniformly ugly.

[kiltie65]

And a poor loser.

[entropy12]

Memo to Trump: Ignore the mosquito bites on your rump. You are the bull elephant, and the 2%-3% candidates are the gnats.

[entropy12]

Any candidate who is for "AMERICA FIRST" is the type of candidate I will support. All others are slaves of their rich donors, and fecklessly support the cheap labor express desired by their sugar daddy rich donors. That hurts the middle class more than anything else in many many ways.

[odawg]

“I think ultimately when voters fully grasp who he is and what he supports, I think they’ll run away with their hair on fire.”

Yes, Twerp, that is why we run away from you; we fully grasp who you are and what you support.

[Charles Henrickson]

Any candidate who does not understand the Constitution, or who is OK with abortion or sodomite “marriage” (”Well, it’s the law of the land”) is the type of candidate I will NOT support. Thus I have crossed Trump off my list.