Look, I notice others lit you up for saying that Breitbart is anti Trump. Sorry ma’am, but the evidence is clear, Breitbart has given Trump a TON of coverage and 95% of it is positive, and the other 5% is not negative, just circumspect.
Here you are all paranoid about Breitbart being in the tank for Yeb (his coverage in Breitbart has been 100% negative) - it’s just one of the most ridiculous and demonstrably wrong assertions ever made on the site.
I don’t think the word boomlet was a good choice, but damn, the author (Flynn) has far more conservative anti establishment cred than you ever will.
Ok and here is my reply to your more civil post.
You right, I was just put off by the term boomlet and that
he has already lasted longer than what it actually means.
Besides I’ve seen Breitbart sell out before, right after
Andrew died. Remember that? The story he was going to break.