Posted on 07/30/2015 8:41:38 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
But now she’s a high priestess in the Church of Trump, so all is forgiven.
Yes. I read her book. She has some good things in there, but toward the end she says that nothing else matters, including abortion , until we secure the border.Epic, 100% fail.
No, the correct answer is that Coulter is for once ...
Epic, 100% correct.
Unless you were born yesterday, it should have by now sunk in that we are in the last inning, bottom of the ninth. Legalizing 13 or 35 million Illegal Aliens is strike three, three outs, game over. But it's not a game at all. It's what Franklin said about people like you: "A Republic, if you can keep it".
Do you not understand that even in 2004, Bush43 only beat the (D)ummie by 3 million votes? Since then they have already padded the rolls with several million more - before Amnesty. It will not matter who is nominated going forward! Whatever perfect views and credentials you want them to espouse will NOT matter, they will only be token opposition in an un-winnable election.
We are watching in realtime the Romans' suicidal welcoming in the Goths to permanently dilute the state to an unrecognizable, disloyal and unsustainable form. I guarantee there were people back then just as distracted from the glaringly obvious as you yourself appear today. Your Trump Derangement Syndrome is like being on the deck of the listing Titanic and complaining about the tune the orchestra is playing.
I think this rule was dropped when AC became a two-time Mittbot.
She just isn’t over Romney not running again, is she?
Yes, I do understand all of the points about immigration you’ve laid out.
But if you agree with Coulter that abortion doesn’t matter until immigration is fixed, it’s just another example of conservatives adopting liberal views in order to support a liberal (Trump)...now, shamefully, even to the point of trying to minimize abortion.
That view is completely incompatible with conservatism. Go ahead and tell it to a single baby as that child is being torn apart and sucked out of the womb, or having an instrument shoved into his/her skull. “Sorry, until the border’s closed, you just don’t rate!”
And you know what you can do with your “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” That term more accurately describes conservatives who are falling all over themselves for a self-described Democrat.
Oh, Anne.
It’s nice to see that you finally got over your love affair with Chris Christie.
"But if you agree with Coulter that abortion doesn’t matter until immigration is fixed, it’s just another example of conservatives adopting liberal views in order to support a liberal (Trump)...now, shamefully, even to the point of trying to minimize abortion.That view is completely incompatible with conservatism."
You fail on logic as well.
All the (R) nominees are pro-life, thus all the ones elected President are always pro-life. And what has it got us? What can a perfect Presidential candidate's opinion on abortion ever get us?
You need to come to grips with the reality - no candidates' opinion on Abortion means anything in light of Roe v Wade, and a country more than half full of narcissists and evil, near-Nazi-like stooges. It has as much real bearing on policy and change of heart that anything else might. You might as well worry about what football team they root for or how they wear their hair.
I don't want to call you insane but the classic definition is doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result. Yet here you are obsessing over this "conservative" litmus test, but one that will NEVER EVER get a chance to be utilized even *IF* that candidate could get to the White House in the first place.
Furthermore, there are foot soldiers in the war on the Nazi Abortion cult who are actually doing stuff - successfully as we speak. These folks with the videos, and the dripping releases, who clearly learned from O'Keefe and others, are *really* making progress. They are thinking outside-the-box. You however, are NOT.
You are laboring under the misconception that we elect a tyrant for four years who will singlehandedly make everything alright. However, that belief-system or argument has a fatal flaw. It literally means that whatever wonderful results we get in "our" President can simply be undone by the election of "their" President in the next cycle. It promotes an oscillating nation with a set of values based on majority rule.
"And you know what you can do with your “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” That term more accurately describes conservatives who are falling all over themselves for a self-described Democrat."The label fits your postings here, but if you truly hate it then I will refrain. However, Reagan actually was a (D)emocrat, of the FDR variety no less, and Trump is far more party agnostic than any other to come before him. But why the obsession with the (D) label? Are you saying that is significant? What about Zell Miller (D) versus Romney (R) or any almost any other (R)epublicrats?
She is a graduate, with honors, from Dick Morris College of Predictology......................
That was about the most long-winded strawman I’ve seen.
We weren’t discussing candidates’ positions on abortion; the issue was your agreement with Coulter that abortion doesn’t matter until the border is closed.
You can call me insane, or whatever else you want...I really don’t give a damn. But I will note that the accusation of insanity is leveled at me because I advise upholding conservative principles instead of trashing them...including the sanctity of life.
I also note that a socially conservative, pro-life president is termed a “tyrant” by you.
A glance at your posting history tells me where you’re coming from, though. A longtime Freeper recently posted about signups who are largely silent until election time; they crawl out of the woodwork to advocate for the lesser evil, preaching about the folly of holding to conservative principle, and then slink away after the election-—the loss-—is over with.
You signed up in 2006. Your first post was made in 2014. Then, after that single post, you were quiet until this month, when you suddenly remembered you were a Freeper and started to push Trump.
"That was about the most long-winded strawman I’ve seen.We weren’t discussing candidates’ positions on abortion; the issue was your agreement with Coulter that abortion doesn’t matter until the border is closed."
~sigh~ I don't know how you could misunderstand the clear comment I wrote, it's only a couple above your reply, not scrolled several pages away.
Anyway, RE: Coulter: Yes, but I took it further, laying out how it doesn't matter ever - from the standpoint of a Presidential Candidate. We don't give the President any power over the Supreme Court. That's civics 101. Furthermore, I stressed that in this election - when we are standing on the precipice of 35 million or more future (D)ummycrat votes it matters even less than zero. Turn your logic circuits on.
"I will note that the accusation of insanity is leveled at me because I advise upholding conservative principles instead of trashing them...including the sanctity of life."
NO! I said doing the same thing over and over is insane. You can make your own decision if your foot fits that well-defined shoe. You ducked what I really said, which is that we ALWAYS have pro-life candidates, and it has never made an iota of difference. You have the gold-standard for pro-death in the white house right now, and previously you had all those wonderful pro-life Presidents. It doesn't matter. I would NEVER tell you not to care, but I am telling you that you are wasting your time. Confront your cognitive dissonance.
"I also note that a socially conservative, pro-life president is termed a “tyrant” by you."
Boy did you "note" wrong. Completely and utterly and absolutely wrong. I said no such thing. Even Stevie Wonder could see what I meant. I said: we do not elect a tyrant that gets to implement his checklist of voter demands of which abortion is but one of an infinite number of things ... because ... if this was the case then there is no logical reason to worry about these issues in the first place as they are only temporary ... because ... the very next election can undo everything yet again. We are playing their very game, and always losing, by perpetuating and re-exploring this myth again and again.
The myth is that every four years with an election the ship of state can lurch 180° on a dime - and that is so far from what the founders intended as to be laughable. We ourselves are feeding this myth by first believing a Presidential victory leads to national salvation, and by dwelling on such issues such as Abortion, something they cannot change even if they want to, and it actually locks these horrible things into the background radiation. The enemies of the Constitution won the battle in the Supreme Court, and they are laughing as we argue over whether our Presidential candidates are pro-life. The President is not our savior.
First of all, candidates are always going to tell you they are pro-life, okay, feel better? Yes? Well that's why they tell you they are. And that's where it always ends. That's where it will always end as long as the enemy has their Supreme Court firewall. It is why I said - perfectly logically - that it makes as much difference worrying about what football team they root for or how they wear their hair. You could resurrect Andrew Jackson into a pro-life body and even he wouldn't tell the Supreme Court to f*ck off again.
"You signed up in 2006. Your first post was made in 2014. Then, after that single post, you were quiet until this month, when you suddenly remembered you were a Freeper and started to push Trump."
What does this even mean? You think you can deduce anything from looking at Freeper's posting history? What if you found something completely different? Would that change the precise issues being argued here? Of course not. Anyway, you couldn't be more wrong in what you believe you learned. I'm everywhere, in places you wouldn't dare set foot, fighting the good fight for my Constitution, for more years than you could possibly believe. Whether that means anything to you is irrelevant to me, to you and to these issues.
Bought her new book. I didn’t expect to learn anything new, but so far it’s really good. Her sarcastic wit makes it a little easier to choke down the infuriating facts.
So what you are saying is that she went to the same prediction school that Dick Morris (our resident toe sucker) did?
OK....you get a pass.
“Oh, I’m not asking those first two questions, believe me, because they were answered long ago for me. The issue of Trump has nothing to do with Bush or any other RINO. It has to do with Trump himself.”
Exactly!!!
DT is PT Barnum 2015 version.
My problem is not so much the message, its The Messenger!
This is the standard Trump states in his book.
I’d like to see a moratorium on all immigration for about 5 years until we get the border secure and figure out exactly what kind of immigration system we either want or need.
Bringing a million immigrants a year into the US is insane.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.