The fact of RomneyCare for Massachusetts is suitable to me, as each individual state should be able to chart its own course, irrespective of the long-term consequences in Colorado and Washington state. Nationally, I'd be opposed, and there's nothing to suggest that RomneyCare would have made it through the fractious Congress.
For my entire voting lifetime, I've supported Conservatives in the primariescheering when Cheney became VP. I can't help it if the forever-plottingforever-cheating DemonRats put Trojan Horse laws into the manner in which we vote. ("Open primaries", "Motor-Voter" and drivers licenses for Illegals). At one time, New Hampshire was safe for conservative Republicansbut Romney won NH's primary with "crossover votes".
I suspect the DemonRats are plotting now to replace the thoroughly-unlikeable and insidious Hillary with an unknown, but charismatic minority candidate. Heck, even Michelle is spouting candidate-worthy Populist rhetoric!
We should help to oust Hillary by using Hillary and Benghazi in the same sentence as often as possibleas suggested here at FR.
The present danger to the US isn't climate change, it's this century's Obama-planned Holocaust for Christians, Kurds, and Yazidis. (Not to mention danger from Islamist nukes). Like William F.Buckley, I'd prefer to be governed from names out of the telephone book. To paraphrase Rumsfeld, "We have to use the Republicans we gotnot the Republicans we wish we had".
My tagline has long-suggested another reason. :(
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3293881/posts
You go, girl!
:)
The present danger to the country is people doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. It’s a sign of insanity. Hopefully your next ballot will also get lost so you don’t do us any more damage.