Look at the title above #5’s link to what I was posting. My post was about sources of corroboration of Obama’s birthplace not his college ID.
The fact that in addition to the 1967 school application which named Honolulu as his birthplace there was a fake college ID is incidental. It was not possible for me to post that link and exclude the fake ID as they were on the same page. That was simply the best, most legible image of the St. Francis of Assisi school application that I could find on short notice.
There have been previous threads on freerepublic.com over the years dealing with that fake Columbia College ID. For example:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3077466/posts
However, just in case you are still bothered by it, here’s another link to the St. Francis of Assissi school application that doesn’t also have an image of a fake Columbia University ID.
http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/terrorists-strike-obamas-jakarta-elementary-school/
Enjoy! :-)
What manner of logic would compel anyone to continue using a source that was already flawed. How, then, could you trust anything that the source purported to say. I fail to follow your reasoning.