Posted on 04/18/2015 10:18:52 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
With pretty much the entire GOP presidential road show up in New Hampshire this week the prospective candidates are all vying for face time with the press. That seems to include New Jersey Governor Chris Christie who is running hard to convince voters that they might be able to tempt him into the race if they really, truly insist they need him. Along with the rest of the pack, Christie is getting peppered with questions on every subject under the sun, and on Tuesday he was examined on the issue of Second Amendment rights. The rather vague answer which followed may prove a little troubling for conservatives.
Chris Christie took a centrist tone on guns Wednesday, calling for the “right balance” between gun control and the Second Amendment.
“We’ve got to make sure we have public safety, but on the other hand we have to protect people’s rights both as sportsmen and hunters and for self protection too, find the right balance,” Christie told a group of New Hampshire voters at Chez Vachon in Manchester, according to New Jersey newspaper The Record.
The comments came just over a week after news broke that the New Jersey Republican governor was not invited to address the NRA’s annual conference in Nashville last weekend. The other prominent GOP 2016 contenders were invited, with the exception of Sen. Rand Paul.
The Second Amendment was always going to be a tricky question for Christie as he attempts to navigate his way from being a successful executive in the very blue state of New Jersey to a prospective leader on the national level. After all, he is governor of the state with the second most horrible gun laws in the nation. Christie has, in the past, made a similar argument on this point as he has with other conservative issues. There is little he can do about it, or so the argument goes, because the Democrats run the legislature with an iron grip and he can’t summon new laws out of thin air on his own. To a certain extent that may be true, and it’s a defense which has been used by Republicans in traditionally liberal states to good effect in the past. But when you’re running for president it doesn’t really change the fact that you’re still the governor of the state with the second most horrible gun laws in the nation.
But even that excuse doesn’t completely cover the bases here. If Chris Christie had spent his entire time in office championing gun rights – even if such measures never reached his desk – and vetoed every gun restriction measure that the legislature sent to him, he would be on considerably more solid ground. After all, there’s not much more than that to be done in a virulently blue state. But Christie hasn’t been a simple bystander. He signed a raft of gun bills in 2013, one of which required the state to turn over New Jersey mental health records to the feds. Others were just as disturbing. If he felt that this is what he had to do in order to “go along to get along” in the Garden State, that was his choice, but that’s something he’ll be held accountable for in the national race he’s pondering now. And when he answers questions like this when discussing gun control on the national stage, well… I wouldn’t expect his NRA “C” rating to be going up any time soon.
The right balance would be to recognize the CCW permits issued by other states while in the process of implementing his own “shall-issue” permit system. If he really wanted to recognize the inalienable right of New Jersey citizens to keep and bear arms, he would support Constitutional Carry.
Premature detonation.
“shall not be infringed” is perfectly correct.
We already know what Crispy’s right balance is. No tactical rifles in the hands of the Plebes. No high capacity magazines. He’s a POS RINO who needs to stay home and shut up.
I would vote for Jeb Bush before I would vote for Christie. He’s a despicable fat little Dweeb who sabotaged Mitt Romney by walking down the beach holding hands with Barky just before the election. Gave possibly the worst Keynote speech ever heard at the Republican Convention. Did he even mention Mitt’s name in the speech?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.