Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: sten

I can see it’s clear you don’t understand the history, purpose or meaning of the Natural Born requirement.

You can start correcting your thinking here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3275080/posts?page=34#34

and here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3275080/posts?page=35#35

And pay particular attention to the legal distinction between the terms ‘residence’ and ‘domicile’.


16 posted on 04/15/2015 2:55:09 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Hostage

sorry, i’ll look to supreme court rulings before freeper threads

minor v happersett was one of the first mentions of 2 parents and on soil. the founders explained why they used the term in the federalist papers.

yet now we’re supposed to believe that someone born outside the US is a natural born citizen. that’s just laughable.

the dems will give TCruz all the ink he needs to get the nomination. then they will trip him up and win the presidency on a walk


30 posted on 04/15/2015 8:19:09 AM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson