Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: Bidimus1

You simply REFUSE to understand. This is NOT complicated. ALL that matters is WHAT did the phrase NATURAL BORN mean when it was incorporated into the Constitution. If you look to statutes or case law, YOU LOSE.


44 posted on 02/24/2015 11:20:12 PM PST by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can STILL go straight to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: HMS Surprise

Please Sir, stop helping our cause you are a detriment to logic and reason.

Your style is more befitting Nelson Muntz far more then Lord Nelson of HMS Victory.


66 posted on 02/25/2015 9:40:35 AM PST by Bidimus1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: HMS Surprise

Since you seem to be unable to show a definition that supports your statement I will provide the most recognized and contemporaneos definition available

Webster 1828

5. In the United States, a person, native or naturalized, who has the privilege of exercising the elective franchise, or the qualifications which enable him to vote for rulers, and to purchase and hold real estate.


You will note that only 2 classes exist in that definition Native or Naturalized.

Since Persons born of a Citizen do NOT have to be naturalized they MUST be native.

And that Sir is how the word CITIZEN was defined and used at the time Constitution


69 posted on 02/25/2015 9:54:33 AM PST by Bidimus1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson