So wrong... omg. Citizen at birth happens everyday by force of statute. Natural born requires NO statute. Natural born means that NO statute is needed. The state of citizenship is NATURAL by simple circumstance. If you are born in country, of two parents who are citizen, your citizenship is uncontested and NATURAL. No statute is ever needed to clarify. Having just ONE parent who is not a citizen POTENTIALLY makes you citizenship questionable. This is proof that it is MERE citizenship at birth, not natural born citizenship.
Please cite case law or statute to support your claim that somehow the word natural born citizen has a legal meaning other than the one I referred to as being a citizen at birth. I will not hold my breath for it of course as it does not to the best of my knowledge exists, in fact there are so few incidences where the legal concept comes up that it is almost a nullity in US law. The legal definition I pointed to is one of the few that is used at any time in US law.
Understanding of NBC use to be more widespread in previous decades. (wayback here i previously submitted proof of such understanding several years ago)
Then what is needed to clarify? What source defines natural born citizen solely as you define it? And what source says it's right?