Hmmm...didn’t know the Log Cabin Republicans were part of the GOPe.
This is an elephant that deserves to be ignored.
The cancer in the party is called Boehnerism.
This article is complete crap, from the first lying word to the last.
Here’s the big one: there is NOT A WORD in the 14th amendment that gives the Federal Government to arbitrarily redefine words with meanings commonly accepted for centuries. Moreover, NOT one signatory to a single ratification action for the 14th Amendment dreamed in his worst nightmare that decades later pompous neo-fascists would claim that by ratifying the 14th, those good people intended to give marriage rights to fudge-packers.
Absurd beyond rational belief.
We actually don’t have a two party system any longer, one is the dominatrix and the other the submissive sex slave.
Author Austin Given seems to be a one-man-party in Wisconsin...
What this idiot fails to realize is that RINO moderates have done nothing to promote individual freedom nor will they stand up to the tyranny of the left. If anything, they have given the green light to almost every policy supported by the president. He’s part of the Log Cabin Republicans, huh? His sexual preferences aside, I think he was hit in the head with a few logs because he’s devoid of logic on what’s destroying the Republican Party. We’re not the problem. We’re the solution. If the RINOS really stand for individual freedom they need to stop all of this bipartisan nonsense with the Democrats. They’re the ones who are destroying the country with their reckless policies but the RINOS want to attack us instead. The breakup of the GOP is imminent and thank goodness for that!
They are complementary now in a number of areas, which is the source of conservative complaint.
Welcome to wearing yellow markers on your lapel in this fundamentally transformed fascist Oligarchy now ruling us.
If you refused to believe that the GOP wants Conservatives exterminated from any political relevance in society - this ought to clear it up for you.
What a bunch of crap.
So am I understanding that this person is calling conservatives and TEA party people racists and tyrants? I think I’ve had quite enough of this chit.
“both support the individual citizens of our country with their unique visions.”
Please find out what this guy is smoking, ingesting, injecting or sucking into his nose and send some of it to me?
They forgot: “If only Ronald Reagan hadn’t won the presidency by such huge margins and made people love conservatism.”
This article is such a pile baloney propaganda. RINOs are the real republican party because they believed in “social justice.” Well, what happened to the democrats? They believed in the Constitution, but you don’t hear this writer crying about the fact both party’s have left that behind.
I don’t even believe the premise is correct. Did the republican’s believe in social justice or did they just believe it was wrong to treat human beings as possessions. When both parties began, no one republican or democrat believed in allowing the govt. to take money from one group and give it to another group so they can sit around on their rear ends and do nothing. Yet, Fabian socialism is very much a part of the GOPe today.
This is the second time this week I’ve seen someone writing that republicans started as libs though they know full well that the commies we have today did not exist in this country when either party was formed. This is nothing but a steaming pile of GOPe propaganda.
But then again, I’m certain they believe that when the republican party was founded it would have been for gay rights (gays in the military and gay marriage), abortion on demand, open borders, welfare for the world and RomneyObamacare. Just as the GOPe believes today.
It looks like he has spent a good deal of time theorizing and looking things up, unfortunately it looks as though he has undergone this exercise in order to deny legitimacy to people with which he disagrees. He casts “those people” as existing outside of both tents and as Dixiecrats, which is to say the democrats which used to dominate in the South. I don’t think you can really have it both ways, that just strikes me as irrational lashing out.
Now we are in real trouble but I think Honest Abe would have far more problems with the rest of that blog than he ever would have in common with it. Sorry pal.
Incorrect.
Amendment X The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
Limited government and states rights go hand in hand.
Perhaps the motivation to create so many new "rights"....
Also the state’s rights thing is about minorities being able to move to a place where they can set up shop as they like. Because of Federal concepts like interstate commerce we end up with the oddity of something like tyranny of the minority (because you have voters in one state making decisions for everyone else), the charge to the contrary is a recognition that if you let people vote the way they want, they will, which is not the same thing at all as tyranny of the majority. Slavery was not perpetrated by the majority against the minority, you had a very small minority of people who had the right to vote, it was tyranny of the minority against the majority. Just something that’s been bugging me.