Not according to federal courts. It is a federal issue because federal courts with the aid of liberals everywhere have made it so. Therefore a Federal Marriage Amendment is necessary.
You are an idiot.
Our Constitution is based on English Common Law, governments have been involved in marriage for seven hundred years.
Then why are the feds sticking their big fat homo noses into it? As long as they do we’re going to resist!!
FUJB!!
The problem is, by demanding that the federal government NOT define it, it is actually FORCING the federal government to do that very thing.
If they don’t define it as between one man and one woman, they by default have bastardized the definition of Marriage, defining it as anything goes.
And it doesn’t prevent governmental intrusion into people’s lives because now anyone who defies the government’s definition, is subject to federal government action because they are *discriminating*.
There are no neutral positions on moral issues. Any government corrupt enough to destroy long held moral values is not a government we can afford to have around.
Also, don’t forget, that many moral things were illegal when the Founding Fathers established the Constitution and Bill of Rights and they did not see that as intrusive government.
Libertarians are looking to destroy this country and while I am all in favor of getting back to what the Founding Fathers established as far as the responsibility of the federal government, using the Constitution and Bill of Rights as the weapon with which to destroy the moral fabric of this country is NOT what they intended by any means.
We CANNOT survive with the moral depravity libertarians would inflict on us in the name of *limited government*