Ditto that. Sheesh it is not that hard to understand this article!
He’s giving two scenarios in which one of “our guys” might have a chance to win and giving more detail on the second option.
It’s one that many of us have suggested over and over. We have debates between invited conservative candidates all through one summer, and then ALL conservatives agree to get behind the winner. (jeb, mitt, etc need not apply). So Cruz, Walker, etc would duke it out in an arena of our own choosing, not in debates sit up and established by the liberal media and the elite. OUR debates run OUR way. Conservatives decide which constitutional candidate wins our support and then we pull together and throw all our support to him.
It’s obvious some on the thread are not reading the article.
It's obvious as well that others on the thread are reading the article and consider one of the scenarios an exercise in naïve futility.