Yet another EXEMPT Judas 'Prince':
"Do not worry. We have your back, our beloved King."
Posted on 07/05/2014 2:10:40 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Yet another EXEMPT Judas 'Prince':
"Do not worry. We have your back, our beloved King."
That picture makes me ill.
From the looks of that picture, Mr. Bonner has become a “Rump Ranger”. That answers a lot of questions that have accumulated
about him.
Me, too.
In short; Stay Tuned, but don’t hold your breath while doing so.
This idea of with holding fund from the president will cause severe dislocation of this country is a bogus argument. When the congress with held funds from Nixon during the Viet Nam War, this country didn’t all of a sudden collapse. All congress has to do is with hold the funds from OBAMA every time he makes a “PRESIDENTIAL DECREE”. Which alphabet government agency will he use to enforce his decree? With hold funds from that agency. They can also decide where the money should be spent, and where it cannot be spent. That would be more meaning full than taking this administration to court. By the time it goes through the courts, his term will be over.
34 points ahead in the polls----dumped by the voters.
Ex-majority Leader Eric Cantor and friend.
A REFRESHER COURSE IN LOSING Cantor in 2013: "One of the great founding principles of our country was that children would not be punished for the mistakes of their parents. It is time to provide an opportunity for legal residence and citizenship for those who were brought to this country as children and who know no other home."
B/c no one believed that Constitutional fable, Cantor doubled down---he later offered a new explanation for why he supports granting amnesty to individuals brought into the country illegally as minors. It's “Biblical,” he said in a local radio interview.
That "revelation" offed the sucker but good. So much for Cantor's gulling the voters---endorsing a measure intended to dismantle US ntl security.
=================================================
Cantor stupidly believed the rest of us just fell of turnip truck---that we know nothing about the Dream Act except what he makes up.
THE FACTS ARE THESE---The Senate amnesty bill is dangerously flawed, and its glaring omissions WRT protecting US ntl security, cannot ever serve as the basis for useful legislation.
By legalizing illegal aliens w/out shoring up law enforcement, we hand an engraved invitation to global Third Worlders----all of 'em salivating to ride the US gravy train.....each separatist group conniving to achieve its hidden agenda.
Amnesty recklessly opens the door wide for illiterate, low-skilled aliens, born and bred in savage cultures, here to suck up US benefits and take jobs away from Americans.
Third Worlders may, in fact, contribute their labor to the US, but their loyalties are elsewhere----they have no intention of becoming Americanized....of participating as equals in American culture, revering our vast history, or preserving American values.
The Senate amnesty bill is a blueprint----it amply demonstrates that illegal separatist populations intend to usurp the US political system to advance their own hidden agenda.
================================================
The Senate "Amnesty" bill includes two “slush funds” amounting to $150 MILLION annually, replenish-able with eternal tax dollars for years to come....... earmarked for groups like the blood-thirsty La Raza.
They will lose. Congress had the process defined for them in the constitution. Impeachment.
Which is exactly why the White House circulated it. Your reaction delights the other side.
Conservatives have to get away from these losers!
"... and as violations of the constitutionally prescribed separation of powers."
Beware! There are actually two sides to the separation of powers coin. While constitutionally ignorant voters are always being reminded about the separation of powers of the legislative, executive and judicial branches of the unconstitutionally big federal government, the second side of the separate powers coin, state powers, is rarely acknowledged imo.
More specifically, voters are essentially left in the dark about the Constitution's division of federal and state government powers. State powers evidenced by Congress's constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers, the unique power of the states to ratify proposed amendments to the Constitution as evidenced by Article V, and the 10th Amendment's clarification that the Constitution's silence about a given issue automatically makes the issue uniquely an intrastate issue.
In fact, because of Congress's Section 8-limited powers, the states, not the corrupt feds, actually have the lion's share government power to serve the people. In other words, citizens should be working with their state, not federal lawmakers, to find legislative remedies to their problems.
As a side note concerning the federal government's constitutionally limited powers, consider that the states would really be a dull, boring place to grow up and live in if parents were to make sure that their children were taught about the federal government's constitutionally limited powers. /sarc
Guess both of them Irish descent? Whatever
This is exactly what people said about Hitler in the 1930's.
I don’t know if this has a chance or not, but in the chance it is, I would hope everyone on FR would get behind the House and give them our strongest support. Don’t dismiss it or put the plaintiff’s down, but get behind them and push.
Boehner is obviously drunk.
Why doesn’t the house go after him in lawsuit for aiding and abedding illegal immigrants; no background checks (safety issues for Americans) and health issues. Go after Pelosi for encouraging and welcoming the illegals at the border.
And why isn’t the Border Patrol Unions standing up to this crap? If it was a pay raise issue in their contract, they would strike, but being exposed to diseases, not allowed to do their job (security, background checks, etc)...No strike.
Boehner, the other GOP establishment and more hard core left’s side?
I don’t care. They are doing conservatives a favor by circulating it. It will help us rise and throw off our chains.
1) Ant guesses on the strongest infraction??
2) What are the Cons in losing the case??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.