Well .. Bush didn’t concede either - in 2000.
And .. the dems hated him for it. That’s the main reason they tried to destroy his terms in office.
And .. I think it has a little to do with the fact that Obama seems to be determined to destroy Iraq.
She is so smart, or so she thinks....
Here she is:
http://www.csmonitor.com/About/Staff/Linda-Feldmann
Linda Feldmann covers the White House from the Monitor’s Washington bureau, where she has been based for 24 years. She also serves as chief political correspondent, and has covered all the presidential campaigns since 1996. In 1999, she won an Exceptional Merit Media Award from the National Women’s Political Caucus for her series “Where Women Stand.” From 1989 to 1990, she served as the Monitor’s Moscow Bureau Chief. She has also been Op-ed editor, foreign-affairs writer, and assistant international news editor. In 1987, she worked at a Russian newspaper, The Moscow News, for three months as part of the first US-Soviet journalists’ exchange.
Feldmann has a degree in Russian language and literature from Middlebury College and a Master’s in International Public Policy from the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. She is married to Warren Richey, the Monitor’s Supreme Court correspondent.
And Al Gore was a leftist hero for not conceding.
“His non-concession speech was red meat for his supporters, but it played poorly on the national scene where most were quickly agreeing that this election was over.”
Played poorly to whom? The Leftist Republicans? Prolly yes but not to Conservatives who think its treacherous for a Republlican to call another Republican a KKK member in a primary.
So, Republicans collude with Democrats to damage the future of a candidate who won the majority of the Republican vote, both in the primary and in the runoff election, there is clear evidence of illegality and more than just an indication of fraud, but those same Republicans warn said candidate to shut up and take it because it will damage his future?
They can damage his future by intentionally throwing the vote with Democrats and it’s good, but he’s damaging his future by noticing this and attempting to do something about it, which is bad.
Do I have that about right?
So, it’s a “stunning” loss which tells me this author was surprised it happened yet it’ll ruin McDaniel if he looks for and finds voter fraud.
Yeah, sure, whatever
I have a feeling that the “smug” will be wiped off the pundits’ faces come November when all the carefully laid treachery backfires and Cochran loses the seat to the Dim challenger....They think Conservatives are similar to Dimowits and really want to be steered astray.
Press release from rinos to lib media to create false narrative. Total garbage.
McDaniels should have a chat with Tom McClintock of CA. He has been a target of “fellow Republicans” since they tried to bully him out of running against Ahnold. His party colluded with Dems against him when he then ran and won CA’s 4th congressional district.
It’s not easy being a conservative among this group of GOP thugs!
Coming from Yahoo it means McDaniel is doing exactly what he should.
What are they going to do if he refuses? Not let him be senator?