Posted on 06/19/2014 3:36:50 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
“A Conservative. A non-ringer. Someone who was running to win. An actual opponent for Zero. Yknow ?”
Ok, in 2012, who was that person ?
Now in 2016 you might get Cruz. Palin is not running. Frankly Santorum is one of the front runners.
Just like against Sen. Thompson before.
Poor sport spoiler Democrat in disguise Romney doing what he does best:
Novak: "Fred Thompson drop-out rumors traced to Romney campaign"
It not only was NOT suspect, it was dead on the money. Willard has been backstabbing Conservatives for his entire political life, and sabotaging Palin in 2008 (especially AFTER he got passed over for the VP slot). His fingerprints were all over the knives.
She calls you and chats? Or can you read minds?
“Ok. I thought each was a terribly flawed, “
All of us are flawed. Romney was essentially a Socialist-lite. How could he run against a socialist regular and hope to get the Republican vote? Obama won with fewer votes than he had in 2008. But a larger percentage of Republican voters sat out the 2012 election than did in 2008. Ouch!
Your bastard imposer of statism, Willard Carpetbagger Romney,
will no doubt go after any conservative ... including
Sen Cruz.
Romney represents Mexico and the Democrats.
Scott Walker. The Conservative superstar of the year.
Romney - the Magic RINO:
Chihuahua Romney - the One and the Only "Magic RINO(TM)":
"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party
over to the traitors in the battle just ended.
We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged
to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support.
Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates
wouldn't make any sense at all.""
-- President Ronald Reagan
It’s why the situation is so hopeless. There are so many stupid Republicans. Very stupid. Very, very stupid.
We don’t have a chance.
The truth is, he only runs against conservatives. Hillary would be safe.
I think we get your point.
.
Hell no!
The boss has stated that Free Republic is not a liberal debating society. Your words of support for the bizarre cultist "Bishop" Willard Romney reveal that you're not a genuine Conservative. I come to FR, the foremost site for for Conservative activism, to engage in meaningful conversation with like-minded Christian (and Jewish) Conservatives -- not with those who stand with a gun-grabbing, pro-sodomite abortionist.
And, by the way, note that I did not ping the Patriot who founded this site in any of my posts to you. So your claim that I went "crying to Mr. Robinson" are utterly without merit.
And really, if you're talking about people in the McCain campaign who actually knew Palin and could dish (real or invented) dirt, wouldn't it be more likely that they were long-time McCain loyalists, rather than Romneyites who somehow happened to get picked up along the way by the campaign?
That was in 2008-9 when that story that was picked up by the American Spectator and believed so many people came out. A year or two later, when campaign advisors were gearing up for 2012, you did find Romney people talking down Palin, in the way that people in one campaign do put down prospective rivals, but that story that secret Romneyites in the McCain campaign were sabotaging Palin to clear the way for Romney back in 2008 was a questionable one.
That said, it does look like Kevin Madden, who had worked for Romney in 2008, was putting Palin down in interviews before the election. My point, though, is that there was enough bad blood between Palin and McCain's people and enough incentive on their part to blame her for their defeat that you don't have to put the blame for whispers or rumors at Romney's door.
You cannot be serious.
Romney was a longtime supporter of abortion and Planned Parenthood.
Only two years ago he said, "If two people of the same sex who LOVE each other want to adopt children" he believed it should be made possible. That's right---he believes queer perversion is "love", and he thinks those who practice it should be able to adopt and abuse kids.
Is that what you call an impeccable personal history?
So in sum, Romney did it, they admitted it and he deserves the blame. Nothing suspect.
Sure he’s serious. And no one stops him or any of the other Romneybots lately from stirring the crap.
So get ready for 2012 all over, top to bottom. Again.
He's better than that traitor Obama! And he's better than Hillary. I contributed to every candidate's campaign (starting with Perry, then Cain, and Newt), changing horses as they dropped out.
In the end, I even contributed to Romney...because I love my country and Obama hates it.
And Hillary is too old and effed up to know that she is nothing but a useful idiot.
Sure, I don't like Romney, but he is light years better than Obama (can you imagine if Obama or Hillary were in charge of the Olympics).
I simply point out that one of the articles cited as "proof" was just a rumor circulated by somebody who'd worked for the McCain primary campaign in SC, and that there were enough people in the McCain campaign who wanted to blame Palin for their defeat (and conceal their role by attributing the rumors to someone else) that there's enough blame to go for the rumor mongering around before you even get to Romney and his people.
People in the McCain campaign who were in a position to know anything about Palin and spread damaging stories about her were more likely to be McCain loyalists than people picked up from the Romney campaign.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.