Posted on 11/23/2013 12:08:08 PM PST by Clintonfatigued
And now we have Elizabeth Warren. You should be happy, happy, happy.
Just a quick glance....
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2451008/posts
I think he could beat Obama.
Brown/Palin 2012?
1 posted on Sun 14 Feb 2010 02:16:23 AM CST by SmartInsight
.........
Well, it’s either Palin, Brown, or Eric Cartman.
8 posted on Sun 14 Feb 2010 02:32:01 AM CST by UCANSEE2
..........
We have rules.
[pic]
10 posted on Sun 14 Feb 2010 02:38:55 AM CST by onyx
...........
Ill vote for a paper bag with a face drawn on it to beat obama. CHANGE SUCKS!
17 posted on Sun 14 Feb 2010 02:43:47 AM CST by Always Independent
............
Palin / Brown I might be able to support once I see more of how he votes.
39 posted on Sun 14 Feb 2010 03:11:26 AM CST by taxcontrol
..............
Why is it every new face that comes along is tagged to become president?
53 posted on Sun 14 Feb 2010 04:38:42 AM CST by upsdriver
..................
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2432601/posts?q=1&;page=21
Scott Brown for President 2012!!!!!!!!!!!
26 posted on Tue 19 Jan 2010 08:46:57 PM CST by molybdenum
...............
Palin/Brown 2012....that would be a GREAT looking, conservative duo.
33 posted on Tue 19 Jan 2010 08:54:44 PM CST by DCBryan1
................
Guess he doesn't get drunk as classy as this guy does.
does he proudly post pics of licking peoples faces?
Does he proudly allow his daughter to marry a Rasta man?
If you did then you have no business even opening your mouth........
I wonder if Stewart kisses his kids like that?
I don’t think running a Packers fan in that border district is a good idea.
He’s the only R in the race so far, long time till the filing deadline.
In that mostly blue-collar, historically labor-Democrat, but socially conservative, district, I want to run a conservative Polish Catholic longshoreman from Duluth, not a rich, long-haired businessman who parties like a party-school undergrad and roots for the main rival of the Minnesota Vikings. That’s not to say that only a demographically “pure” candidate can win, since Chip Cravaack met none of those criteria yet in 2010 beat the seemingly unbeatable longtime incumbent Jim Oberstar (who had the perfect profile for the district), only that it would be easier for the GOP to overcome the RAT’s structural advantages and run someone who can peel off voters from the RAT base (who otherwise might reflexively vote for the ultraliberal carpetbagger with a D next to his name) while increasing conservative turnout.
Hookers and blow for all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.