[2ndDivisionVet]

[lardog]

Who’s laughing now? I am. LOLOLOL

[Jane Long]

Great catch on Krispy's State Assembly flyer. Once a RINO/Progressive, always one.

Sarah's right (again), We Don't Have to Settle for Krispy!!

[kitkat]

BUMP

[CynicalBear]

I think she just said something like “well, bless his heart”. Southerners will understand that one.

[svcw]

But but but “Christie is the only one who can beat Hillary”.....refrain from FRers
Fool me once shame on you - McCain
Fool me twice shame on me - Romney
Fool me a third time, hit me with a 2X4 - Christie
Played that game NO MORE

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

The media is praying that Palin makes some type of statement that is construed as being supportive of a Christie candidacy.

[VRWC For Truth]

The fat focking moron is going nowhere.

[Washi]

In Before the Palin Bashers.

[Still Thinking]

“We certainly though don’t have to settle for any candidate, any politician that would go along to get along with an agenda that stifles our economy and would strip any of our freedoms that are constitutionally protected,” Palin said Monday on Fox News’s “Hannity,” when asked about the GOP establishment saying Christie is the only Republican candidate who could win the presidency in 2016.

That doesn't sound like a less-than-wholehearted endorsement, it sounds like an anti-endorsement to me. Course it IS from Politico, so you wouldn't expect honesty or forthrightness.

I do fault Sarah for framing the issue about "stripping" Constitutional rights, as if the battle of good vs. evil were just kicking off. Better if she had talked about what kind of candidate would be most likely to "restore" civil rights. Those on the right too often accept SQA and talk as if what conservatives need to do is hold the line (not including Sarah in general with that comment, just a generalization). Always play offense when you can, you can't win if you only ever play defense.