To: Red Statements
I am pretty sure Bloomberg’s “statistics” include anyone under 21 and perhaps fudged up to 22.
7 posted on
09/15/2013 6:31:24 PM PDT by
ThanhPhero
(Khách sang La Vang hanh huong tham vieng Maria)
To: ThanhPhero
25 wouldn’t surprise me. As I recall one of the “Atlanta Child Murders” (ca. 1980) was that old.
To: ThanhPhero
I am pretty sure Bloomberg’s “statistics” include anyone under 21 and perhaps fudged up to 22. I recall one anti-gun study that described anyone aged 25 or less as a "child" for their purposes. Sounds like Bloomberg just did the same.
10 posted on
09/15/2013 6:47:42 PM PDT by
Kip Russell
(Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors -- and miss. ---Robert A. Heinlein)
To: ThanhPhero
I am pretty sure Bloomberg’s “statistics” include anyone under 21 and perhaps fudged up to 22.More than likely, the new "normal" tracks the Obama regime's choice of how old "children" can be covered under their parents' health insurance... 26!
That was a game changer.
17 posted on
09/17/2013 8:36:08 PM PDT by
publius911
(Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson