No I don’t see it at all.
I also want to know what you think is inaccurate in post 170.
I think there is NOTHING inaccurate in post 170.
That is why I’m puzzled that you don’t see that my post agrees with you. It’s probably just poorly written.
That aside, my point is simply that we can’t hold ABO’s like Lake accountable for what they believed about that election. Their belief was not irrational. Their belief that Romney was better than Obama, while still believing that Romney was really bad, is not treacherous or deceitful. In fact, they were very above board about it.
Even Jim Robinson finally settled on that position, and I don’t think any of us would question his credibility.
You are RIGHT that we should try to make Romney something that he never was (pro-life, pro-natural sexual relationships, etc.). You are right that they tried to make Reagan something that he wasn’t (pro-choice).
That is what you were saying, isn’t it?
CORRECTION: SEE LAST PARAGRAPH. Left out a NOT.
I think there is NOTHING inaccurate in post 170.
That is why I’m puzzled that you don’t see that my post agrees with you. It’s probably just poorly written.
That aside, my point is simply that we can’t hold ABO’s like Lake accountable for what they believed about that election. Their belief was not irrational. Their belief that Romney was better than Obama, while still believing that Romney was really bad, is not treacherous or deceitful. In fact, they were very above board about it.
Even Jim Robinson finally settled on that position, and I don’t think any of us would question his credibility.
You are RIGHT that we should NOT try to make Romney something that he never was (pro-life, pro-natural sexual relationships, etc.). You are right that they tried to make Reagan something that he wasn’t (pro-choice).
That is what you were saying, isn’t it?