There is no benefit in trying to make Romney not be what he was or in making Reagan out to be what he wasn’t.
That has nothing to do, however, with the logic of ABO’s versus non-ABO’s.
The first said that “ANYTHING” was better than Obama.
The second said that STANDING FOR PRINCIPLE was most important of all.
I stand with the second group, but there is no way I can “prove” my position or “disprove” the ABO’s, since both positions are opinion based.
Lakeshark is not being anything but honest about what he believes is/was the right answer. I do not see that as sinful or anti-conservative.
xzin, I have never done that, nor did I do it in that post, so drop that nonsense. Post 170 was completely accurate.
As far as lakeshark, his/her first post on this thread was post 87, I don't know why you defend that post, nor the following ones he posted at me.