From: History of Parliament Trust
Statutes of the Realm: volume 7: 1695-1701
I'm sorry, but this is at least 50 years prior to Blackstone [1753].
You think this is relevant.... why?
See? That's what I mean. In 467, I asked So are you saying that some natural-born subjects were "really" natural born by blood, but others were only "proclaimed" natural born? Was this a functional distinction in any way?
and you replied in 469
Yes. The Right of Inheretence concerning the 'excepting if the mother or father were aliens' part of the in the English law posted earlier in the discussion.
You used it as an example, and now you're asking me why it's relevant. If you can't keep track of your own arguments, I don't have the energy to recap them for you every time.