No, do you know what your problem is with me?
It's that I DON'T write about history from ideology.
I write about history from the point of view of what actually happened.
And reality conflicts with YOUR IDEOLOGY. I get it.
Look, here is the bottom line. You got what you wanted. A POTUS w foreign allegiances occupies the Oval Office.
Huh. I guess that's why I voted against the sucker twice.
Here is how you come across. We’re on the Titanic. The iceberg has been struck. People are reacting to it as best they can.
Which in your case, means puncturing the lifeboat of the Constitution by poking as many holes in it as possible.
I'm simply saying: Don't try to address the problem by trying to punch holes in the Constitution. It's the best, and only, lifeboat we have.
And if you imagine that by twisting the Constitution that you are actually helping anything, you are, in my opinion, sorely out of touch with reality.
And by the way, if you don't like reading my posts, then don't read them. It's not as if I'm going to disabuse you of your fantasy anyway.
“And by the way, if you don’t like reading my posts, then don’t read them.”
It’s not like you read mine. I’m just more honest about it.